 | | Re: Posting problem
|
|
(...) Wow, that is very weird. Can you give a pointer to the message that did post correctly? (...) Hmm, that's disturbing. I wonder if some hidden translation is happening on the From line somehow/somewhere which is confusing the known-name lookup. (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: anyone else having problems with this group?
|
|
(...) By default, Outlook Express dumps old messages from news groups. If you right click on the newgroup, you will get a menu with properties as a choice. Select properties. Select the local file tab and hit the reset button. Then go to the tools (...) (20 years ago, 14-Jan-05, to lugnet.fabuland, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: New Newsgroup Please
|
|
(...) OK, just to confirm, you've been using lugnet.robotics for this (not lugnet.robotics.rcx)? I guess what's maybe not generally known is that lugnet.robotics.rcx is actually a newsgroup and not just a hierarchy. Its charter specifically includes (...) (20 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Space: Obsidian Stealth Strike Craft for sale - The Brickee Mart
|
|
(...) See, that was my thinking too when we were talking about copying MOCs, (as I said elsethread) but when it started to get into more general copyright issues, the zen of stealing things, and suchlike, o-t.d was as good or better a choice. Since (...) (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Space: Obsidian Stealth Strike Craft for sale - The Brickee Mart
|
|
(...) It is most certainly on-topic for LEGO. It should be in lugnet.market.theory. Followup to lugnet.admin.nntp. (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGOfactory.com launches... and it's big!
|
|
(...) For future reference, you should make sure URLs begin with http:// otherwise Lugnet treats it as a local reference. ROSCO FUT .admin.nntp (20 years ago, 10-Nov-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
(...) Gee, thanks. (...) Is your question the result of having carefully read all the articles in that newsgroup and having reflected upon things for a few days, or is it your first response? Just curious. Those who are, do seem to believe that the (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: 8 new subgroups of lugnet.people (Kids, Teens, Adults, Singles, Couples, Parents, Support, LGBT)
|
|
(...) I haven't been reading much Lugnet news lately as I spend most of my online Lego time on lowlug.nl. Somehow, the few times when I came back here I didn't feel I was missing much. This people thing really takes the biscuit though. I'm an adult, (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet question and ldraw updating question
|
|
(...) Read this page: (URL) understand the overall process. It points you to this page: (URL) to actually make changes, such as registering a new email for posting. XFUT admin.nntp ++Lar (20 years ago, 7-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
"Jesse Alan Long" <kiraya_malzant@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:I4BK1F.1Mw6@lugnet.com... snip (...) remember, I (...) and what (...) has (...) being but (...) foolish (...) everyone (...) an (...) life. (...) die (...) the (...) equalty, then (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) LOL!! Actually Jessie, I reckon half the people think you're a troll, half think you're a nutjob, and half think you're a twit. Either way, you're funny as hell! Keep it coming! :] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada (20 years ago, 27-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Parents could look at it as securing all objectionable content away from their childrens' eyes, or the could look at it as a website that has content that's objectionable enough that kids shouldn't be using it at all. (...) Simply applying the (...) (20 years ago, 25-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
|
(...) Well, I was not expecting THIS much of a response simply because I said of what I said in my letter. A lot of people must think of me as a narrow-minded, bigoted, right-wing, Bible-thumping homophobe now because I said that it was not a good (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Parents won't always see anything in any particular way, so I don't follow your logic here. (...) Consider how they'd react if LUGNET proudly advertised that it had a gigantic porn library that was accessible by anyone. I don't understand your (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Parents won't always see it that way. Consider how they'd react if LUGNET proudly advertised that it had a gigantic porn library that was only accessible by those who signed up as being 18+. Setting up a section that's only accessible by (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) That's not the point. What are you saying? That because someone can legally get married at age 16, adult content on LUGNET should be made viewable by a 7 year old? Because a 17 year old knows about same-sex relationships, a 10 year old should (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) I think it has always been thusly (that one could lie about their age). (...) I don't follow what you mean. The objectionable content would be masked from underage viewing. JOHN (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Of course not. All I'm saying is that if he wants LUGNET to be "kid-friendly", steps need to be taken to make it that way because I think it is getting too adult-oriented in certain areas. (...) Exactly. And when they do check out LUGNET and (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) The point is, Chris, is that that decision should be up to the parents to decide, not you. If Todd wants LUGNET to be for everyone, it must cater to the lowest common denominator, and that is about a 7 year old. (...) Good stuff???? Are you (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
|
(...) Fine. Now we know your position on the subject. Some, however, may want to take a different position WRT to parents who are deciding whether to allow their kids to use LUGNET. (...) As I have said before: clarity. You have stated your view. I, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
