Subject:
|
Re: Why these news groups were created
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:01:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
7952 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.nntp, John Neal wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.nntp, David Laswell wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.nntp, John Neal wrote:
| |
I don’t follow what you mean. The objectionable content would be masked
from underage viewing.
|
Parents won’t always see it that way.
|
Parents won’t always see anything in any particular way, so I don’t follow
your logic here.
|
Parents could look at it as securing all objectionable content away from their
childrens’ eyes, or the could look at it as a website that has content that’s
objectionable enough that kids shouldn’t be using it at all.
| |
Consider how they’d react if LUGNET proudly advertised that it had a
gigantic porn library that was accessible by anyone. I don’t understand
your point.
|
Simply applying the words “Adults Only” to any portion of LUGNET is tantamount
to claiming pornographic content in many peoples’ eyes.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Parents won't always see anything in any particular way, so I don't follow your logic here. (...) Consider how they'd react if LUGNET proudly advertised that it had a gigantic porn library that was accessible by anyone. I don't understand your (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
|
151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
