To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.nntpOpen lugnet.admin.nntp in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / NNTP / 1593
1592  |  1594
Subject: 
Re: Why these news groups were created
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.nntp
Followup-To: 
lugnet.admin.suggestions
Date: 
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:32:31 GMT
Viewed: 
6598 times
  
In lugnet.admin.nntp, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
   In lugnet.admin.nntp, John Neal wrote:
   Now, if LUGNET hopes to retain the moniker “friendliest place on the internet”, it is going to have to publically be more kid-friendly, IMO. Kids need safe places to hang out on the net, and I believe that LUGNET needs to be hyper-sensitive to this issue if it is going to make such a claim. I don’t believe open, adult conversations such as some of the ones that occur on LUGNET are “kid-safe”. Why not admin with an iron fist in the open groups and lay off on closed ones?

It’s kind of funny, but I think that kid-friendly is an awful term for the suggestion that John is propsing. Kid-hostile is closer, but a single term for kid-we-don’t-trust-you-until-you-reach-a-magic-age-even-if-you’re-plenty-mature-to-take-part would be better.

The point is, Chris, is that that decision should be up to the parents to decide, not you. If Todd wants LUGNET to be for everyone, it must cater to the lowest common denominator, and that is about a 7 year old.

   I don’t know, but if my kids found a big wall that they couldn’t get around (but they could) behind which all the good stuff was taking place,

Good stuff???? Are you kidding me? You’re mad! The “good stuff” you are talking about is all of the off-topic crap that has nothing to do with LEGO! The “good stuff”, sir, is the stuff about LEGO.

   I think they would not feel all warm and cozy on the “safe” side.

Honestly, I have no idea why you are arguing what you are arguing.

JOHN



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why these news groups were created
 
(...) It's kind of funny, but I think that kid-friendly is an awful term for the suggestion that John is propsing. Kid-hostile is closer, but a single term for kid-we-don't-trust-y...-take-part would be better. I don't know, but if my kids found a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)

151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR