General Discussions about LUGNET : Search Results: password


Administrative / General / Search Results: password

Results 501 – 520 of 524.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) I don't agree. (I see the point, but I don't think it's that simple.) What is security -- fundamentally? A file served from under the URL (URL) the /images/ directory is HTTP-password-protected with the username and password combo of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) Yeah, this whole thought of calling it "snooping" seems ridiculous to me. How many times have you had to manually edit URLs you've come across because they just didn't plain work until you "hacked" away at them? If it's world-readable and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) No, you're defining webserver differently. I'm not going to bother quibbling semantics with you. (...) No. "in a place public can get to" != publically available != published. The three of them often co-incide, but do not necessarily do so. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) Not necessarily. Does (URL) contain links to all the users /~user directories? In 90% of the cases, in my experience,. not. Same for ISPs. So 90% of the web is not intended to be seen by your logic. Security through obscurity is no security at (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) Interesting idea. Could this also be done via NNTP? Either by running a seperate news server on a second port, or -- and I have no idea if this is doable because I'm not well-versed in the password mechanism of NNTP -- by making the password (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) OK I think I am getting this now. Actually it tripped another synapse :-) and I got another idea that might be bad and it might not. Actually it might even be similar to some of the ideas you have allready mentioned. How about if durring (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) It would allow Brad to say to the system, "Hey, don't let anyone post to the system using From: Brad Justus <legodirect@lego.com> unless it was actually Brad Justus (as verified by his ID & password). (...) No. (...) No, not unless you wanted (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) I think you might be onto something there. Ignoring for the moment the issues of someone possibly wanting to change their code word later or needing their memory refreshed, what you're suggesting is quite feasable. (...) Hmm, if the code word (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
In lugnet.dear-lego, Brad Justus wrotes: (...) I've been cogitating on this from a technical standpoint and I think I have come up with a general workable solution, all things considered. I agree that if something can be done, it should be done. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.157)

		Re: Hey Todd (Re: LUGNET Memberships)
(...) I can't promise 100.000% confidentiality, since no matter how unlikely, theft or break-in is always a distant possibility, but I can promise that personal information will never be sold or given out to spammers or to LEGO or anything like that (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.154)

		Mail Account Info
Todd (et al?): So...I got over-zelious with my cleaning of my mailboxes and blew away my email/account info for lugnet. So went a-hunting. Now I have some comments: 1) It would be nice if all the account info (News, etc) was easily accessible from (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.154)

		Re: Suggestion for improvement
(...) Hmm, I must be misunderstanding your meaning -- that sounds contradictory. If person A in your family logs in and does stuff, then person B logs in instead and does stuff, then that's two different people using the same machine (two different (...) (25 years ago, 3-Sep-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.147)

		Re: NO auction updates in non-auction groups (was: Re: FA : Soccers sets + much much more)
Todd Lehman wrote in message <37bb02cd.169966426@...et.com>... (...) I wonder if it's time to think about creating a few filters, and some very clear rules on market postings. Suggested rules: Thread your auction updates with your auction (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.146)

		Re: Mentors (was: Re: Jonathan Wilson's posting privileges on LUGNET)
(...) someone with mail with subjects like "WTF are my Lugnet posts?!" Seriously, though - possible to do it via the web? Say I'm a mentor - I go to a specific URL, give a username/password, then am presented with each of the messages I need to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.146)

		Re: Please help keep LUGNET clean
(...) lugnet.charges lugnet.arraignment lugnet.judgejudy j/k (...) Benevolent dictator, eh? :-) (...) And what is the growth curve? You got a graph or something? (Wouldn't surprise me if you did ;-) (...) Lugnet.admin.city-council for planning (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.144)

		What happened to my posting setup?
Last night I found out that lugnet wouldn't let me post with out filling out the posting setup again. I filled it out again and every thing seems fine but, I still keep wondering what happened. Lately, I had been having some computer trouble and (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.143)

		Re: how to cancel a message (was Re: [MindStorms FAQ 4.3 How do I make a temperature sensor?]
That doesn't sound secure enough. I would suggest that when a user "registers" to use the web interface, their browser should be send a random unique "user ID", and the user ID should also be sent to the email address they registered with. If they (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.142)

		Re: Interface changes coming today
(...) Say, does it let you choose which cookies (by name or somesuch) are transported and which ones aren't? One of the things the member-profile cookie will have, besides user-id and password, is the location -- home/work/etc. -- for things like (...) (26 years ago, 21-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.118)

		Re: Interface changes coming today
(...) I just went to the setup page and entered my info. What is going to happen if I (or someone else) makes a type or something dumb like that? I'm mainly interested for curiosity reasons - I'd like to know how slrn will report to me that a post (...) (26 years ago, 19-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.117)

		Re: typo quiz
(...) The unfortunate thing about arbitrary amounts of text in cookies is that they get transferred every time a mouse click is made to the server, which gobbles up bandwidth when multiplied out over time and users. But one thing we might be able to (...) (26 years ago, 18-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

password
(score: 0.117)

More: Next Page >>