Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:34:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
922 times
|
| |
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, William R. Ward writes:
> > "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> writes:
> > > What about a lugnet.announce.moc?? This would let people posting MOC
> > > announcements across all themes have a place to put their MOCs up before the
> > > whole community. The charter for .announce could more forcefully
> > > specifically ban MOC posts and refer MOC posters to the new group.
> >
> > I like this idea a lot.
>
> I'm not so keen on it as it then is in the .announce hierarchy meaning you
> still would see the posts in there when viewing .announce via the web.
> Perhaps lugnet.moc.announce instead of lugnet.announce.moc????
Well, lugnet.bulid.announce would be more appropriate in that case.
No need to create a new top-level hierarchy.
Do the brickshelf and LSAHS subgroups bother you in the web interface?
Probably not, but only because of their volume of traffic.
I think most people have become accustomed to seeing MOC announcements
in .announce, so there's no reason why they would object to having the
.announce.moc or .announce.build group used for them now. People like
yourself who would rather not see them can view it plain (without
subgroups).
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
| (...) IMHO, this would be the better choice, to meld well with the current architecture. .moc.announce is counter-intuitive with what's currently in place. May I suggest that if an .announce.moc group is set up that it does not boost posts into the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
| (...) Yes. Or maybe just lugnet.build... the announce is a bit redundant, perhaps. (...) It's not the low volume per se, it's the pithiness. Posts that appear there are indeed breaking news. When I want breaking news I would like to review .announce (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
| (...) Me too. Note please that this doesn't necessarily have to be Todd and Suz. (or Steve or Jen or Dan) There are other people who would be willing to take some of the load if empowered to do so. As James Brown said, administration is not (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
