Subject:
|
Re: Shop At Home catalog Engine Shed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:45:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
211 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > And this highlights the problem with restricting LD folk to one ghetto... we
> > just got two crossposts of the same article. No way to avoid it... Jason and
> > I did it at the same time. (Had one of us waited to see if the other was
> > doing it, the other could well have been waiting as well)
> > Some say it's a small price to pay to keep LD folk in their proper place...
>
> 1. Don't repost articles to other groups at behest of others (even if they
> ask nicely). Let them do it. If someone doesn't have posting privileges to
> some group, it's for a reason, and leave it at that.
>
>
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee wrote:
> > (Please cross-post to .trains. Thanks!)
>
> 2. Remember that you are a guest here. Respect boundaries. Don't call upon
> others to post copies of your articles into groups that you are not able to
> post in yourself.
>
> Employees and representatives of LEGO, posting as such, have been granted
> posting privileges in selected communications channels here on LUGNET (e.g.,
> lugnet.lego.direct). General community areas (e.g., lugnet.general,
> lugnet.trains, etc.) are for community use and are neither marketing nor
> communications channels at the disposal of LEGO employees. Thank you.
If someone feels that a post in a .lego group has relevance to a particular
theme or group (whether it be train or castle or what-have-you), why
shouldn't they cross-post it? If that someone happens to be a LEGO employee
without posting priviledges, why shouldn't they ask for the cross-post?
In this particular case, the discussion that followed was by far more
appropriate to .trains (where can I get parts to build that train shed) or
.dear-lego (please make set x) than it was to lego.direct.
The initial post ('due to interest, we're going to make instructions to that
background you saw in the catalogue') was certainly very relevant to trains
(IMHO).
I understand (and somewhat agree with) the logic of keeping Lego employees
segregated, but I think going this far (interesting train stuff is not
allowed in .trains if a LEGO employee happens to post it) is cutting off our
nose to spite our face.
YMMV.
thanks,
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Shop At Home catalog Engine Shed
|
| (...) If you're adding comments to the message as you add the other newsgroup(s), then I think it's reasonable. But to just crosspost it for the sake of spreading the word is in violation of the spirit of the lugnet.lego.* restriction. Whether you (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Shop At Home catalog Engine Shed
|
| (...) 1. Don't repost articles to other groups at behest of others (even if they ask nicely). Let them do it. If someone doesn't have posting privileges to some group, it's for a reason, and leave it at that. In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee wrote: (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
