Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:02:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
970 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, William R. Ward writes:
> "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> writes:
> > I'm not so sure if I'd want a moderated group, if 'moderation' means
> > 'approved by a live person before getting posted.' If it means the group is
> > paid closer attention to by admins and inappropriate posts deleted/edited
> > and posters warned, that might be better.
>
> Lugnet has gotten by just fine without moderators, but that's because
> historically the admin(s) have been there to step in and say "don't do
> that" and even delete messages if needed. If it is expected that
> admins will continue to play a less active role, as they have
> recently, then moderation might be the answer. However I'd rather
> have active admin(s) than moderators.
Me too. Note please that this doesn't necessarily have to be Todd and Suz.
(or Steve or Jen or Dan) There are other people who would be willing to take
some of the load if empowered to do so.
As James Brown said, administration is not necessarily editorial control or
moderation. Community norms can be enforced with gentle reminders (backed up
with the power to remove posting priviledges if necessary for those that
repeatedly flaunt the norms) which are surprisingly effective when used
correctly and in (ahem, sorry!) moderation.
> > What about a lugnet.announce.moc?? This would let people posting MOC
> > announcements across all themes have a place to put their MOCs up before the
> > whole community. The charter for .announce could more forcefully
> > specifically ban MOC posts and refer MOC posters to the new group.
>
> I like this idea a lot.
I'm not so keen on it as it then is in the .announce hierarchy meaning you
still would see the posts in there when viewing .announce via the web.
Perhaps lugnet.moc.announce instead of lugnet.announce.moc????
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
| (...) Well, lugnet.bulid.announce would be more appropriate in that case. No need to create a new top-level hierarchy. Do the brickshelf and LSAHS subgroups bother you in the web interface? Probably not, but only because of their volume of traffic. (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.announce is not for MOCs
|
| (...) Lugnet has gotten by just fine without moderators, but that's because historically the admin(s) have been there to step in and say "don't do that" and even delete messages if needed. If it is expected that admins will continue to play a less (...) (23 years ago, 3-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
