To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 8527
8526  |  8528
Subject: 
Re: Uselessness of .debate
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:34:50 GMT
Viewed: 
2083 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > But this fails to address something I see as a larger problem- that the
> > off-topic.debate group is being used for more than just a release valve for
> > off-topic arguments/discussions that by the nature of newsgroups automatically
> > crop up from time to time, and are instead being used to support ongoing,
> > unsolvable and ultimately meaningless diatribes and debates.  If there were a
> > way to reasonably solve that problem, I'd rather see that addressed
> > specifically.
> 
> Well, some would argue that the god debate has meaning, since those of us on
> the wrong side are in danger of losing our immortal souls, etc. But ya.
> Definintely unresolvable, no matter what, though.

The recent history of .debate is certainly that the types of shouting
matches have little chance of being productive, however, I will point
out that back some time ago, the "Libertarian" debate DID have real
productivity. It DID change someone's outlook (and being the person
who's outlook was changed, I think I can say that authoratively). That's
what I'd like to return to, the productive debate.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
(...) Hear, hear! Though I don't expect that I'll switch to Libertarianism or Christianity any time soon, I have learned a good deal about those two views. That, for me, is the primary reason for participating in .debate (that, and getting the (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Uselessness of .debate
 
I *said* they had flaws and were thought starters... so you'll see a smiley behind every one of my responses, I'm trying to be funny in them. I suggest you post some ideas of your own, I'm trying to get some brainstorming going... (...) Why not? (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)

90 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR