Debate : 8220


Off-Topic / Debate / 8220	8219 \| 8221

Subject:	Re: Uselessness of .debate
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general
Followup-To:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 19 Dec 2000 23:08:11 GMT
Viewed:	480 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: > Kidding aside, I agree. Why else would Todd have put debate fodder links in > the web page for the group? Ask Suz why -- she was the one who put them there. --Todd

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Uselessness of .debate
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) in (...) Ah, of course! Todd never struck me as being one who liked a debate. :-) Cheers, Paul LUGNET member 164 (URL) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Uselessness of .debate
(...) I assume you mean "informally" in that for example, Frank sends me a note telling me to cool it... or vice versa. (because if you mean formally we're back to a moderator/council/review thingie) I think that's a good idea. More... I think it (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)

90 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search