To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 8219
8218  |  8220
Subject: 
Re: Nature of man (was Re: Problems with Christianity)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 22:32:30 GMT
Viewed: 
1819 times
  
But according to others in this group, man doesn't HAVE free will - God knows
everything anyone will do from cradle to grave - where is the free will in
that?

James Brown wrote:

> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Steve Chapple writes:
> 
> > The more you describe "your morality", the more (I think) I see the
> > basic problem.  The Bible says that man is essentially evil and in
> > need of a Savior - you (I think) say man is essentially good.
> 
> <snippage for the purpose of emphasis, also because I'm coming in late, and
> am (bluntly) too lazy to hunt up the argument to date and comment in a
> forward-moving way>
> 
> I'm not sure about other flavours of christianity, but I know that the RC
> church, at least, doesn't hold to the "man is essentially evil" view.
> 
> The RC position (IANAP) is that man *can be* evil.  Man can also be good.
> Man is not inherently either, just inherently imperfect.
> 
> Man (unlike the remainder of God's creations) has free will, and for that
> free will to be real (as opposed to just a perception of free will), the
> options must exist independent of man's nature; ergo, man is neither good
> nor evil, but has the capacity for either (or both).(1)
> 
> (I realize that's somewhat circular, but I think my premise can be infered
> more easily than it can be stated catagorically.  If anyone would like a
> more detailed follow through, LMK, and I'll endeavour)
> 
> James
> 
> 1:That's my derivation, and not a matter of doctrine, AFAIK.

--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Nature of man (was Re: Problems with Christianity)
 
(...) Well, I can't speak for others, but here is one take on it. (and I haven't thought this through overly much, so it may have holes...) I don't see a contradiction. If I choose to (X), or to not (X), how does God knowing ahead of time which I (...) (26 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Nature of man (was Re: Problems with Christianity)
 
(...) <snippage for the purpose of emphasis, also because I'm coming in late, and am (bluntly) too lazy to hunt up the argument to date and comment in a forward-moving way> I'm not sure about other flavours of christianity, but I know that the RC (...) (26 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

298 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR