| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Frank Filz writes:
> > > I'm wondering if we need a separate group for the administrative stuff of
> > > Castle World? I'm interested in the project, but right now don't have time
> > > [...]
> >
> > I think I would like to second the motion if it is possible. I am very
> > interested in Castle World and I plan on contributing but some days I am
> > [...]
>
> How stable is the name?
>
> Probably the place for something like that would be under .castle, rather than
> under .org, because it's Castle-focused to the core. Probably something like
> lugnet.castle.org.castleworld...
Sounds like a good idea to me. The only thing I can see as being a quibble is
that once the adminstrivia(1) is over with, then it becomes a really blurred
line as to what goes where. Most Castle World content will be quite happy and
on topic in .castle.
Actually, what I'd suggest is that someone set up a mailing list to deal with
the administrivia, and open it up to anyone interested.
$0.02
[x-posted back to .castle to fish for opinions. Follow-up appropriately,
please]
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
1:That's a great word. :)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
| (...) How stable is the name? Probably the place for something like that would be under .castle, rather than under .org, because it's Castle-focused to the core. Probably something like lugnet.castle.org.ca...leworld... --Todd (27 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
