Subject:
|
Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 03:43:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
376 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> > Well, another idea would be just lugnet.castle.org, and split it when a 2nd
> > group comes along. As far as name stability, how hard is it to move all the
> > messages from one group to another (other than that it may break certain
> > references - though message URLs could be automatically translated)?
>
> As far as I'm aware, it's impossible to move a body of existing NNTP messages
> from one newsgroup to another group without completely destroying the normal
> functioning of the original group.
My thought was that if a while down the road, the name of Castle World was
changed, and it became a problem with the newsgroup, it might not hurt to
change the name of the newsgroup.
Would it be possible to edit (automatically of course) all the messages to
cross-post them into the new group?
It does seem that Castle World is sufficiently established now however that
the name is unlikely to change.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
| (...) Oops (rereading what I wrote), I didn't mean to imply that a plain .castle.org group (with no .castleworld suffix) was a no-go because of that -- I was just answering the part about the feasability of moving messages. (...) Ya, that would (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
