Subject:
|
Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 03:21:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
224 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Frank Filz writes:
> > > I'm wondering if we need a separate group for the administrative stuff of
> > > Castle World? I'm interested in the project, but right now don't have time
> > > [...]
> >
> > I think I would like to second the motion if it is possible. I am very
> > interested in Castle World and I plan on contributing but some days I am
> > [...]
>
> How stable is the name?
>
> Probably the place for something like that would be under .castle, rather than
> under .org, because it's Castle-focused to the core. Probably something like
> lugnet.castle.org.castleworld...
Well, another idea would be just lugnet.castle.org, and split it when a 2nd
group comes along. As far as name stability, how hard is it to move all the
messages from one group to another (other than that it may break certain
references - though message URLs could be automatically translated)?
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
| (...) How stable is the name? Probably the place for something like that would be under .castle, rather than under .org, because it's Castle-focused to the core. Probably something like lugnet.castle.org.ca...leworld... --Todd (24 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
