Subject:
|
Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 3 Mar 2000 05:44:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
352 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> The .castle.org isn't necessary as a group per-se (it -could- be left empty,
> as .cad.dev.org is left empty above .cad.dev.org.ldraw), but it's necessary
> to at least exist as an intermediate level, for consistency and for future
> expansion. One thing to keep in mind about the .castle.* group structure is
> that it will one day house groups for the official LEGO play themes within
> the LEGO Castle system -- so, like .trains.org, any organizations should go
> in a collection for group coherency.
This also helps immensely with topical cross-linkages, for example the
cross-ref link to
http://www.lugnet.com/trains/org/
from
http://www.lugnet.com/org/
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: do we need lugnet.org.castle-world?
|
| (...) OK, splendid. (...) The .castle.org isn't necessary as a group per-se (it -could- be left empty, as .cad.dev.org is left empty above .cad.dev.org.ldraw), but it's necessary to at least exist as an intermediate level, for consistency and for (...) (25 years ago, 3-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
