Subject:
|
Groups for years (was: Re: New group suggestion)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 01:15:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5119 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Frank Filz writes:
> [...]
> Now on a totally different track, how about a new set of groups,
> lugnet.new.2000, lugnet.new.2001, etc where all the discussion of the new
> sets would occur? This would tend to consolidate such discussion, and make
> lugnet.general easier to follow for those who don't want to rush out and buy
> the latest set (or are in Oz and won't see them for months), who just want
> to follow other discussions. These groups would also make it easy for
> someone joining Lugnet say in July, to find the discussion of that years
> sets.
Well, groups do stick around, so the 'new' designator wouldn't be fitting
after a certain point. I was thinking if ever there were groups for product
line years, they oughtta parallel the DB, since this'll be set up for
browsing by year anyway -- so something like
:
lugnet.year.1997
lugnet.year.1998
lugnet.year.1999
lugnet.year.2000
:
is probably more likely to fit in.
Groups for product-line years would be great for crossposting stuff as it
comes up!
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: New group suggestion
|
| It seems to me that a new group for hot availability items (good price, unusual offering, etc) is not really necessary. It seems to me that that is the purpose of shopping. Of course a cross post to buy-sell-trade that a particular person is willing (...) (27 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
