Subject:
|
Re: New group suggestion
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:41:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
rsanders@NOMORESPAMsvic.net
|
Viewed:
|
379 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
<snip>
> ...and more would all fit in. However, a group named .sales would kinda
> exclude "hot news" of items which weren't necessarily on sale but were
> extremely difficult to find in stores.
Another example would be my post about the stack of Belville 5870s I
found <http://www.lugnet.com/market/buy-sell-trade/?n=4437>. I put it in
market.b-s-t because I was pretty sure that I would be selling them. I
believe that this one would meet the 'extremely difficult to find' test.
What would contitute a easy to understand test of this ? Poosible
factors are: age, how many times it has been offered in the last N
months, etc. Would silver buckets qualify at this point ?
Ray
--
mailto:rsanders@svic.net
Experienced Macintosh developer seeks telecomuting position.
If you have such an opening, please contact me.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New group suggestion
|
| (...) Hmm, that's a very interesting example -- totally perfect for .buy-sell-trade as is, but (if there were a .shopping.hot group or somesuch) possibly borderline between that and .b-s-t (although .b-s-t would still certainly be perfectly fine). (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New group suggestion
|
| (...) Hmm, the rationale being what? (Not disagreeing, just unclear on the motivation behind it.) To increase (encourage) more FOTW posts? To make FOTW's easier to find? To make FOTW's come and find you (by subscribing to the group via e-mail?) I'm (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
