Subject:
|
Re: Please help keep LUGNET clean
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Aug 1999 00:50:37 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera.comANTISPAM
|
Viewed:
|
526 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> Again, I think some sort of community judicial system (and whatever that
> means is *wide* open to discussion) will go a long way toward helping this
> community stay strong and survive the coming growth curve of the next five
> years.
As I said in person... find some thing that would be relatively easy to
let a committee decide (NOT The ID number thing, boy what a can of worms
that was) and start it... it doesn't have to be an important thing. But
doing it relatively soon, even with manual procedures, will build the
experience(from your perspective) expertise (from the committee's
perspective) and buy in (from the community perspective) necessary to
make bigger harder decisions committee-solvable later on.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Please help keep LUGNET clean
|
| (...) Awright, I'd be game to give something like that a try -- for gray-area transgressions as well as for problematic non-transgressions. Example scenarios of problematic non-transgressions: * Someone scams thousands of dollars out of a dozen or (...) (25 years ago, 5-Aug-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
