 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
|
(...) This statement implies that you tbink things happening outside of LUGNET should have a bearing on this question. Is there a justification for this? (...) Finally. (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
|
(...) I don't consider this a personal attack. Larry is trying to speak the truth as he sees it. I think he is right too. To my knowledge I didn't have my facts straight on these issues. If I think of more I'll post them: 1. The number of emails I (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) Different than an online community, I'm sure you would agree, but clearly a source of a lot of useful insight, thanks for sharing it. (...) And elsewhere, that's been my management experience (in real life) as well. (snipped the rest, all (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) I have managed several quick-serve restauarant businesses, in one of which I had responsibility over more than 50 employees. I also managed 2 college dormitory floors, one with over 100 residents, both with residents from around the world. A (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
|
(...) I miscounted there were three. Kevin (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) Why not? It was my point, that without someone saying "We've listened, we've considered it carefully, we worked our process and we worked our review process, and we don't at this time see a need to change this particular reviewing action, and (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) Possibly. (...) Because it's representative. A committee of review, appointed by an appointed committee, may, in spite of good intentions, not be representative. Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: Another resignation: I'm stepping down.
|
|
(...) I don't know. But, if things are going to be justified by this 'growth', then I think it'd be a good idea if someone spelt out what that growth was. Presumably those that are claiming this 'growth' requires/justifies for Administraion have (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
|
(...) That's a good question. Should the admin team consider Kevin's multiple attacks on Lenny and myself to be "personal attacks" as well? Or does the higher standard principle apply here, that we have to endure everything on and off line? I (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legends of Todd
|
|
(...) Using an example from our history, Rosa Parks sat where she dam-well pleased; had she abided, things would be much different now. Free expression of ideas has for some time now been stifled on LUGNET - Opposing viewpoints, regardless of (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: One comment
|
|
(...) What we consider profane differs, I guess. But it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to make sure that no one could say you posted a link to something objectionable without warning about it, that's all. (recall that you asked about that very (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
|
(...) Does the Admin Team consider this a personal attack? Certainly worth looking at IMO. (Note I am making no judgement as to the truth or otherwise of the assertion.) ROSCO (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: One comment
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote: >> Say the word, and I'll post a link. > Go ahead, please do post the whole thing. I have the same log you do, so if you > edited it, it would be pretty obvious there was a discrepancy, wouldn't it? > Also please remember that (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: One comment
|
|
(...) Go ahead, please do post the whole thing. I have the same log you do, so if you edited it, it would be pretty obvious there was a discrepancy, wouldn't it? Also please remember that you would need to warn that it may contain material that some (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Grups
|
|
(...) Grups is from the original Star Trek series -- the show where the kids die after reaching puberty. Andy Evans (Who's staying out of the debate, but is always ready to rise to the challenge of Star Trek trivia!) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
|
(...) I think that is irrelevant here so I will not agree or disagree. (...) That's all fine, given that the ToU says "reason X will result in a timeout of 48 hours". However, I doubt the ToU will ever cover every possible reason for timeout, and a (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote: Thanks, Kelly, for your comments about this. I have only one point I'd like to make: (...) Whereas I think it is inevitable *eventually*. That's not a slur against admins, it's just human nature. But (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
|
(...) I think this is a fantastic discussion-- one that we started on the list, but (as I've said on the list) I *REALLY* want admin feedback like this from admins on a continual basis. Seriously, this is the most effectual I've felt yet about the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
