Subject:
|
Re: One comment
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 02:48:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
761 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>> Say the word, and I'll post a link.
> Go ahead, please do post the whole thing. I have the same log you do,
so if you
> edited it, it would be pretty obvious there was a discrepancy,
wouldn't it?
> Also please remember that you would need to warn that it may contain
material
> that some might deem offensive (as with any link that fits that
situation)... I
> tailor my use of profanity to the profanity use level of the people
I'm talking
> with.
>
I dont recall any profanity. (i did use a word referring to a female
dog, AND used a term not quite referring to a wall that holds back
water. OH and i did mock my inlaws.)
here's the link:
www.thepyroguys.com/Chris-Larry.rtf
> But... I'm curious about something, Chris... I'm curious about how,
if I said
> the conversation was privileged, and you agreed, how it is that
Kevin's going
> around quoting bits and pieces out of context? Did you share a privileged
> conversation with him? That part I sort of don't get, help me out...
quite simply. it was my impression that you wanted my help in getting
Kevin to "shape up" and drop the larry-as-chair thing.
when the conversation between kevin and myself happened, the BEST way i
could see to have him understand WHY he needed to "get in line" was to
use your words and arguments. I failed in that task.
seeing as we were talking ABOUT him, it seemed the right thing to do at
the time.
I did not see anything so secret that he/we could not benefit from it.
(unless you didnt want him to know about my in-laws.)
IF you feel that what i did was wrong. i am sorry.
AS WELL, i am certain, that you have used the "not a democracy phrase"
other times, on the LPRC, and elsewhere.
> Would that sort of thing, if you did share a conversation I asked to
be kept
> privileged, without checking with me first... would that sort of
thing make me
> tend to trust you less, or would it tend to make me trust you more?
>
there is no need to belittle me, or be sarcastic.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: One comment
|
| (...) What we consider profane differs, I guess. But it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to make sure that no one could say you posted a link to something objectionable without warning about it, that's all. (recall that you asked about that very (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
