Subject:
|
Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 04:23:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
813 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.admin.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew J. Chiles wrote:
> > Undoubtedly there are
> > other interesting threads around Lugnet that should be there and are not.
>
> I personally would be more convinced if you could find some threads that SHOULD
> be there, but aren't. Also include whether those threads have been spotlighted
> or not.
OK, here is one:
http://news.lugnet.com/trains/?n=24799
It is about 36 hours old. When it was about 6 hours old and with several replys
I spotlighted it. It still has just one spotlight, but there are now 14
messages in the thread which shows quite a bit of interest. And the thread
itself would be quite interesting to a number of people even outside of the
train community.
A thread like this with activity and a spotlight should take precidence over
another MOC post, especially when there have been no replys or highlights for
that MOC post. I like MOCs, but for me and other AFOL there is a lot more to
Lego than just MOCs.
As a test yesterday I spotlighted a couple of other recent and interesting
non-moc articles, but they have not made the list either:
http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=50532 - post on helmet differences
http://news.lugnet.com/build/vignette/?n=211 - curious vignette
Anyone still watching this thread? I wonder how many spotlights it would take
for one of these other threads to reach the list...
-Matt :)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Matthew J. Chiles (16-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Matthew J. Chiles (17-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Leonard Hoffman (17-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Dan Boger (17-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Leonard Hoffman (18-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Richie Dulin (17-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Derek Raycraft (18-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -David Eaton (18-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Bruce Hietbrink (18-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Leonard Hoffman (21-Apr-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf? -Bruce Hietbrink (19-May-05 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|