Subject:
|
Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Apr 2005 04:12:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
578 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew J. Chiles wrote:
> Here is a good example:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/announce/moc/?n=2723
>
> No highlights or spotlights.
> Post has coding mistakes making it difficult to find the pictures
> The model (imho) is nothing special.
> The photos are (imho) poor quality.
>
> Yet it is on the top stories (#5, just before this thread) as of Saturday 03:00
> GMT.
>
> Yes, we have a problem with something. Sorry if I have offended the poster of
> that post (who is possibly a younger builder). Just saw it as an appropriate
> example.
>
> -Matt :)
Replying to my own post and I don't think anyone is really looking at this
thread anymore anyway, even though it continues to be a "top stories" item. I
just wanted to metion that now, 24 hours later, the conditions of the above
referenced post are exactly the same except it is now in slot number 7 instead
of 5.
Yes, something needs to be done on how things get in the "top stories" column.
Being a MOC post alone shouldn't guarentee placement. Undoubtedly there are
other interesting threads around Lugnet that should be there and are not.
-Matt :)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
