General Discussions about LUGNET : 12628


Administrative / General / 12628	12627 \| 12629

Subject:	Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.admin.general
Date:	Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:31:36 GMT
Viewed:	963 times

On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:52:53PM +0000, Leonard Hoffman wrote: > If Lugnet is about LEGO, and LEGO MOCs in particular, I think added > weight to MOCs is a fair. Especially since the only messages to really > gain spotlights are MOCs or flame-wars. Is LUGNET about MOCs? I thought it was meant to be a place for the LEGO Community to center around. "Where minds connect: You are not alone! LUGNET is home to thousands of LEGO fans of all ages. We are a community which never sleeps...." But perhaps that is no longer the case? -- Dan Boger dan@peeron.com

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
(...) Your quote doesn't refute my statement, nor does it support yours. I would say that Lugnet is home to the LEGO Community, and that MOCs are a key importance to that community. Do you think that is incorrect? Since MOCs are the clearest (...) (19 years ago, 18-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
(...) I personally would be more convinced if you could find some threads that SHOULD be there, but aren't. Also include whether those threads have been spotlighted or not. If Lugnet is about LEGO, and LEGO MOCs in particular, I think added weight (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

12 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search