Subject:
|
Re: Compromised Functionality on Lugnet and Brickshelf?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 02:52:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
667 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:52:53PM +0000, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> > If Lugnet is about LEGO, and LEGO MOCs in particular, I think added
> > weight to MOCs is a fair. Especially since the only messages to really
> > gain spotlights are MOCs or flame-wars.
>
> Is LUGNET about MOCs? I thought it was meant to be a place for the LEGO
> Community to center around. "Where minds connect: You are not alone!
> LUGNET is home to thousands of LEGO fans of all ages. We are a community
> which never sleeps...."
>
> But perhaps that is no longer the case?
Your quote doesn't refute my statement, nor does it support yours.
I would say that Lugnet is home to the LEGO Community, and that MOCs are a key
importance to that community. Do you think that is incorrect? Since MOCs are
the clearest expression of the community's involvement with LEGO - I see the
connection between community sharing, LEGO, and MOCs as vital.
But still, I'm interested in the subject of my question: Is there a large mass
of posts that SHOULD be on the Spotlight but aren't?
-Lenny
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
