 | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
|
Come on Lar, I think we can all see the difference between posting a message saying XX parts now in my brinklink store, and a link to an image that shows a valuable building technique which also states in the image (and not in the original posting) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Porthole alternative
|
|
(...) Yes, there should be little room for ruckusii (that's latin for more than one ruckus). (...) But this is the point: this incident aside, I support, encourage and wholeheartedly embrace policing (see rant before about community policing). My (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Porthole alternative
|
|
(...) Be careful, as TC would say: "If I'm doing my duty and respectfully guide someone on something they post, and THEY or THEIR COHORTS cause a ruckus, oh well. That's THEIR problem (and that problem will be corrected too). There should be little (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Membership webpages not meshing with news
|
|
(...) well, from what I can see, the www server and the news server are meant to be two seperate machines... So naturally your page is on the www server (though one day it might be on a members.lugnet.com), and not on the news server. Perhaps the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Porthole alternative
|
|
(...) True. (...) Oooh! That's got to hurt! (...) Portholes are awesome! (...) hmm.... (...) I would have done the same (...) Gee, I wonder how that happened?! (...) Right on! I agree with you on that one! Bram's posts weren't illegitimate, but I do (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: Porthole alternative
|
|
(...) Thanks, Dave. --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Porthole alternative
|
|
(...) And yet this thread generated responses by those who took the idea and made their own portholes for their own trains, so it appears to be a pretty legitimate train topic to me. If Bram said 'You must buy my stuff to see how I do it!' then it's (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: US S@H Specials, Feb 27 - Mar 5, 2002
|
|
In lugnet.announce.lsahs, Tom Stangl writes: Isn't it time to kill this page: (...) (URL) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.announce.lsahs, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Porthole alternative
|
|
(...) I see no yelling. Merely gentle guidance. (...) (off topic) (...) (because I got away with the first one?) (...) Four. FUT admin.general since you seem to have an issue with gentle guidance on this. Your original message was off topic for (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Membership webpages not meshing with news
|
|
Hi Dan! Mah Nishma? As usual it's me and my obnoxious requests. ;-) When I'm somewhere reading the news, I'm at this address: (URL) say I want to get to one of my membership pages, I always type "~88/" at the end of the address, so it becomes: (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Big letters, are Lugnet AFOL's that old?
|
|
(...) Yeah, *gosh* Erin, you're just waaaayy too old! I mean, you can't enter this site if you're over fifteen. So out, out with you! -Shiri P.S. Good to see you again! Where you been? How's life? XFUT .people (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Big letters, are Lugnet AFOL's that old?
|
|
Whoops! Looks like a problem at my end, dangit, looks like I'm over the hill... (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Big letters, are Lugnet AFOL's that old?
|
|
Wow, just logged in and noticed that all the writing in Lugnet is large. Could someone explain to me whether this is temporary or not? Am I just expieriencing browser problems? Or is the Lugnet AFOL constituency becoming over the hill and in need of (...) (23 years ago, 26-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Is it possible to have this added to the confirmation form?
|
|
(...) I suggest making use of a signature file. I have not yet met a newsreader that does not have this function -- even Outlook Express has a signature file function (under Tools, Options, Signatures) as does Netscape and all of the better (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
| |
| | Is it possible to have this added to the confirmation form?
|
|
Would it be possible to add an 'edit my message' button to the posting form - sometimes I've made a simple mistake - like not remembering to say 'remove spamblock to reply' - and a button that allows someone to edit their post before they let it get (...) (23 years ago, 24-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Changes to the set guide
|
|
(...) I'd hold off on advocating that change, because I think the broken links may be temporary. Kevin announced that BrickShelf LLC is seeking permission from LEGO to make the images available. Why not wait to see if he succeeds? (23 years ago, 23-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Changes to the set guide
|
|
In light of recent chages to Brickshelf.com, specifically the removal of the instruction scans, is the set guide going to be changed to remove the hyperlinks to the instructions that no longer exist on Brickshelf.com. The main reason I ask is all of (...) (23 years ago, 23-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newish Idea for LUGNET [was Re: TLC sends people to www.brickself.com]
|
|
(...) Annual CD? That sounds nifty! I'm assuming that is not a product, but a tool for Lego and their distro's use. -Kyle (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Newish Idea for LUGNET [was Re: TLC sends people to www.brickself.com]
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Thomas Garrison writes: [snip post (URL) thanks for your comments! My propper reply will take longer than I have right now, but I just want to leave a few facts w/you, regarding the db.. - There are admin notes in the set (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Criticism of LUGNET's homepage (was: Re: newsticker)
|
|
I'm a bit of a conservative on this. I see nothing wrong with *the* homepage: (URL) Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:GruotL.5r3@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) lugnet.events (...) "calendar (...) the (...) pet (...) Me too. Its a (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
