Subject:
|
RE: Porthole alternative
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 21:38:36 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<bram@po^Spamcake^.cwru.edu>
|
Viewed:
|
300 times
|
| |
|
|
David Koudys writes:
> This is where I will reiterate the thick skinness needed for
> the situation. Bram last post didn't post more sales or
> whatever, he just replied to Larry's post in a 'banter-like' fashion.
>
> I can't speak for Bram, but I don't think he has a problem
> with 'gentle guidance' At least, that's the way it appears to me.
Thanks, Dave.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht
bram@cwru.edu
www.bldesign.org
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Be careful, as TC would say: "If I'm doing my duty and respectfully guide someone on something they post, and THEY or THEIR COHORTS cause a ruckus, oh well. That's THEIR problem (and that problem will be corrected too). There should be little (...) (23 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) And yet this thread generated responses by those who took the idea and made their own portholes for their own trains, so it appears to be a pretty legitimate train topic to me. If Bram said 'You must buy my stuff to see how I do it!' then it's (...) (23 years ago, 27-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
