 | | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Is there a chance to get the names removed from the pages? I was talking to a web guy here at work and he says the fault lies in the hyperlink. In order to be compatible with as much software as possible the hyperlink should use only the email (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) I agree (...) Does the market hierarchy HAVE a curator yet? How does one tell if it does or not, if the curator hasn't put their name at the bottom? (I checked and did not see it at the root or in .shopping, didn't check them all) .trains (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there i
|
|
(...) This is an RFC2047 encoded header, which is the preferred way to transfer 8-bit characters in header fields. RFC2047 dates to 1996, and should be implemented in most user agents. It has not been implemented in the LUGNET web interface? It is (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) So what you're asserting is that LUGNET isn't in conformance to spec but that it works for some mailers because their implementation isn't as spec-picky? The thought of an MS product being better at spec conformance is shocking. Until you (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there i
|
|
(...) Hee-hee...no offense taken! I understand, 'cuz here's what your mail link looks like on my Macintosh: Fredrik =?iso-8859-1?q?Gl=F6ckner?= <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> (...) I'm web interface, and of course, it looks just fine to me posting or (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market))
|
|
(...) I've been addressing this issue before, but I think it is about time to pick it up again. Matthew, I'm using your article as an example, no offence! I frequently see the use of characters which are not in the ISO 8859-1 character set on (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 06:30:36 GMT, "Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@crosswinds.net> wrote: <snippage-before and after> (...) Kevin, you appear to be using the web interface so I cannot really say if it's possible to what I do (I use a newsreader for lugnet). (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Scott (et al.), First, see this post, in response to a very polite and non-confrontational questioning of Larry, and the other GoB members, about the whats, whys and wherefors of establishing , asserting and maintaining a trademark: (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) ...and that bolsters MY point. Unless you are willing honour every single trademark you mention here, you are in absolutely no position to chastise others for not doing so. Doing so would be sheer hypocrisy. Do you fail to see that? Further, (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) So, Scott, why do you point this stuff out ??? (Please DO NOT answer) Often there is no real purpose in such replies. I cannot know why you feel you need to respond to bad posts by others and to continue rants and mud slinging--and I don't (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I see the same behaviour Jude does in my instance of O2K so I did want to give it a whirl for you. Strangely enough, BrickBay has now started successfully generating filled out subject lines. I think the format there is like this: (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Don't tell me Uncle Bill broke LUGNET!?! Jude (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | RE: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) --Bram Bram Lambrecht bram@cwru.edu www.bldesign.org (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I tried making Outlook Express as my default Mail and it has no problems. So the problem is with the config of Outlook 2K. Does anybody else use Outlook 2K for email and IE 5.5? If so, do you have this problem? (...) Good, I am glad I was (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) ok, how about these then? (URL) BTW, Should I have posted this to .admin.general instead of .faq? well, depending what the question is. If it's how to get outlook to work, then it's either a faq or a geek question... if it's why is the LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Both work without any problems. Jude BTW, Should I have posted this to .admin.general instead of .faq? (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) I wonder if it's haveing a problem with the subject definition in the link? try the two links here, tell me if any of those work, or both, or none: (URL) lugnet.admin.general (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Hi Scott, Please refrain from quoting the entire post to reply to a single paragraph. If people want more context, they can always read the previous posts. Thanks ROSCO (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) That assumes you know my motive or decision process for deciding when, and whom, to remind. Which you do not. (...) No, actually it bolsters MY point which is that not every instance needs to be reminded and that some allowance for error and (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I tried to find a good place farther down the thread to tack this on, but I couldn't; it's wandered too far from the point here. Tim's point (and Larry's point, and Frank's point, and Dan's point, and several other people's point) is that (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
