| | Re: Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
|
|
(...) This is the right group. And you should email Todd. (todd.lehman@lugnet.com) (...) There is currently no automatic functioning for most member services, such as setting up or changes to, etc. It is all done by hand by Todd. Now that Suz has (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Question - how do I cancel my Lugnet membership?
|
|
Sorry if this is posted in the wrong group, but I was wondering if you could tell me what steps to take to cancel my membership in Lugnet? If there is no automatic way for me to fill out the withdrawal info, could an Admin please cancel my (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: Listen up.
|
|
(...) Wow, you guys are really good at this! Selecting a winner will be difficult. I was impressed with (URL) this clever response> but Bruce disqualified himself by not posting it over the course of five days. (...and it wasn't an emergency.) -Suz (20 years ago, 10-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
|
| | Re: For the BrickBros
|
|
(...) .mediawatch would probably be good, as it's AFOLs in the news. -Suz (20 years ago, 10-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | LUGNET Site Administration
|
|
All, Last week I flew to Boston to talk with Todd Lehman about LUGNET's status and events leading to it. I was brought up to speed by both Todd and Matthew Miller. Briefly, I'll relate some history. The Transition Team's work toward a community-run (...) (20 years ago, 9-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.announce) !!
|
|
| | Re: For the BrickBros
|
|
(...) Altho I also wish Jeremy and Brian the best, this post doesn't belong in .admin, it is more for .market - maybe .market.theory but I'm not sure. -Lenny (20 years ago, 8-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | For the BrickBros
|
|
(URL) posting is for Jeremy and Brian. When you two open the store let me know I will be the first person in line. Jeremy and Brian (20 years ago, 8-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) NNTP here as well. Only used the web interface twice, from web cafe's, but prefer plain text (most of my computer time is spent in the linux console) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: LEGOFan.org 2.0 is now online!
|
|
"Frank Filz" <ffilz-lists@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:IFxpoC.94s@lugnet.com... (...) How about lugnet.communitysites or lugnet.community.sites or something similar? That way one group could cover other portal/community sites. Richard. (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
Mike Walsh wrote in message ... (...) but (...) You may not be typical, but you are certainly not alone. I'm another NNTP holdout. And let's not forget just *how much* the traffic drops on LUGNET when for some reason NNTP is down. Kevin ---...--- (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: LEGOFan.org 2.0 is now online!
|
|
(...) Hmm, we could add related sites to lugnet.org (lugnet.org.legofan) or we could create a new hierarchy lugnet.site, so it would be lugnset.site.legofan. If we do that, it would at least give people a place for all the "what's wrong with (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) For one, it is easier to sign up, read and follow threads. For old timers, it is also about opening up possibilities. At CSF and CC, what was just ".space" can be expanded into Space/General; Moonbase/Events; Space MOCs; Spacewerks/Inprocess; (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
"Terry Prosper" <terryprosper@videotron.ca> wrote in message news:IFtDGs.13qJ@lugnet.com... (...) vote (...) was cool, (...) Are there any statistics about the number of people who read LUGNET via NNTP versus via the web interface? I always read (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
"Dave Johann" <legomecha@adelphia.net> wrote in message news:IFu985.JpA@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) pirates (...) does can (...) resources (...) information. (...) [ ... snipped ... ] I don't believe trains has another forum. ILTCO has (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) I'm in! Where's the new Bellville post to spotlight? (...) You said it, brother. Still, if this occurs during a late night hour, I take it as a compliment that I am reaching other nations because I know no other US LUGNETters keep the wacky (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Hey Terry, I actually don't think this is a software issue. At some point this weekend my "Scenes from Los Angeles" post was the number one post, and it had only 3 votes.* The current top post (Tony's great ship) has only 5 votes (one of them (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Actually, I've thought both of these are major contributing factors to LUGNET's continuing decline as a community hub. Members don't vote as often as they should partly because some don't use the web interface and I know of no other way to (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Maybe I'm way off-track here, but the proliferation of theme-oriented community websites is part of the problem to me. We had a much stronger castle and space community here a year ago, but thse themes, along with others, have moved to other (...) (20 years ago, 1-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: This is ridiculous
|
|
(...) Yeah, I saw that too. (...) Fat chance of that ever happening! When was the last time someone fixed anything in Lugnet's software? But I agree, the Top Stories thing is pretty messed up. I think it's probably a problem that could be fixed if (...) (20 years ago, 1-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | This is ridiculous
|
|
Hello I just saw 4 posts from the same person in the Top Stories, all posts were 5 hours old and had receive 0 or 1 human recommendation. They all talk about pneumatics, which usually interests only a small percentage of the AFOLs, not because it's (...) (20 years ago, 1-May-05, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|