| |
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> > Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > > In lugnet.general, Anders Isaksson wrote:
> > > I am not sure .general is the best place for this discussion but am
> > > not sure what is! Seems community-ishy as well as publish.html-ishy.
> >
> > Well, if it doesn't fit in anywhere, then it must be .general :-)
>
> Ya'd think. It violates my sense of compartmentalised-dorkdom though.
>
> > Time for a new group? Not necessarily a separate group for LEGOFan,
> > but perhaps .off-topic.off-sites. or something? Feel free to FUT
> > this wherever you want!
>
> I would if only I knew where! LOL.
Hmm, we could add related sites to lugnet.org (lugnet.org.legofan) or we
could create a new hierarchy lugnet.site, so it would be
lugnset.site.legofan.
If we do that, it would at least give people a place for all the "what's
wrong with Brickshelf" posts: lugnet.org/site.brickshelf.
FUT: lugnet.admin.general
Frank
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGOFan.org 2.0 is now online!
|
| (...) Me either actually. (...) nod. You could mail Richard Morton directly, IF you knew that's who you would want to mail... but as you point out elsethread and above, that info's not readily available if you don't already know. (...) Ya'd think. (...) (20 years ago, 3-May-05, to lugnet.general)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
