Results 2001 – 2020 of 2225.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| On Thu, 13 May 1999 07:39:26 GMT, Todd Lehman uttered the following profundities... (...) Quite true. There was no malicious intent. But knee-jerk reactions, bad results. You did somewhere comment on how many posts. There was an attempt to do it all (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| (...) Spam doesn't have to be commercial to be spam. In Usenet, what Richard did is a particular type of spam known as "excessive multiposting" (although I haven't looked yet to see whether it was a single crossposted message or the same message (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: All UK Groups subscribed?
|
| (...) [Pardon me for the apparent harsh tone -- it's not actually harsh -- what follows is a very serious question, not a wise-crack...] How could someone possibly find a tiny local group and manage to post to it, yet not realise that there is a (...) (25 years ago, 13-May-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: Cancelling articles
|
| (...) In Netscape Communicator 4.5 (which just happens to be what I use), you can right-click on the message in the message list window, and select "Cancel message". If the news server lets you (which it should if you authored the message using the (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.faq)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
| (...) There's another icky sticky problem with moderated groups. When you post to one, your message disappears into the wild blue yonder. You don't find out whether your post made it there or not until you either see it minutes/ hours/days later or (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.191)
|
|
| | Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) I thought you were pretty clear...oh well, and I think your idea is a good one (though I would perhaps expand it to allow people to pull interesting quotes from RTL and Lego fan web pages, at least if such (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | Re: Lego Loco Group Session Sunday 5/2
|
| OK, Todd: There is a need for lugnet.trains.lego-l....announce. Or something like that. I need to subscribe by mail, so I can stop missing Lego Loco announcements. Especially if there will be kid-centric sessions. Steve (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | "Too many body parts"
|
| So I'm going the bounced-mail folder here this morning, deciding if any of these represent defunct enough errors to delete anyone from a mailing list, and I had to chuckle at this message below... (I replaced the real address@aol.com with (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | Re: Suggestion for emails
|
| (...) (See below...) (...) What e-mail software are you using that causes this? (...) If you receive the groups in digest form rather than regular-message form, then you'll see something like this at the top of the digest message: X-Digest-Archive: (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | Re: Lar's hoppers
|
| (...) I have a reader with advanced rules functionality. I'd warn everyone that if this happens any real mail they want me to receive may fall victim to a rule like "* from lar@ctp.com > trash" :) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | 1029: "TINE melkebil"
|
| I have three 150dpi scans from the box of 1029: "TINE melkebil". TINE is a Norwegian diaries company. (3 URLs) can see from the pictures that the box was crumbled in the mail. Grr. There is more information at (URL) to answer a FAQ: Sorry, I can't (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.190)
|
|
| | Re: Lar's hoppers
|
| (...) I like this name of the choices. Not everything that is in off-topic.fun is necessarily funny. It's the intent that matters, people posting there are TRYING to be funny. Some of us are just better at it than others. So puns belong with fun. If (...) (25 years ago, 28-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.189)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.189)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| Todd: (...) [...] I think this looks pretty good. It felt a bit wrong to leave out LDraw from the names, but since it isn't the only program handling DAT files this makes sense. (...) Assuming discussions and data are kept together. Would it be easy (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.189)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.189)
|
|
| | Mutilated DAT-file
|
| On April 12th 1999 I've posted a Dat-file to lugnet.cad.dat@lugnet.com with the mail program MS Outlook Express. The subject was: [Newpart] - #2871, Electric Train 9V Motor Decorative Side Somewhere during the process a big chunk of 85 consecutive (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.188)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
