To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: pieniazek
 Results 861 – 880 of about 16000.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: My First Post, and it's a biggun
 
(...) It's a different site. Click the link Kevoh gave you in his post or follow this link if you're not seeing his: (URL) (pretty cool URL, eh???? ) Hope that helps! (20 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: Plan of action
 
(...) Me too. I value everyone's input whether I agree with it or not, as long as it is given in a constructive manner. (...) Yes. It is the one I outlined to you in your mail to me asking me about it and asking about posting here, the one where I (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: My First Post, and it's a biggun
 
In lugnet.build.mecha, Keith Goldman wrote: "I have to agree with Lar" (paraphrased) Goldman agreeing with me? Did the world stop turning???? What just happened there? I felt all warm and tingly inside.(1) Please don't do that again, ok? We have a (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: My First Post, and it's a biggun
 
(...) (snip) Wow. I don't think I have ever seen such a dramatic newbie entry. That stuff rocks and I don't even LIKE mechs. Bravo. I like the color schemes, I'm a sucker for red and grey. I especially like the little flying support vehicles a lot. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Microtrains for your Maersk container ship
 
(URL) I'm not stealing thunder from legotrains, (or way behind the curve and this got announced long long ago) but WOW that's cool... Add a few gantry cranes and you're really rocking! (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.boats) ! 
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: Super Chief Pleasure Dome...another one
 
(...) It has caused me a lot of problems, as the friction increase in my experience has been a lot more than "slight"... problems including bogie pins wearing out, shearing off, and in general leaving a lot more plastic dust around, as well as (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: Super Chief Pleasure Dome...another one
 
(...) Nice work. I am glad that my truck design stood you in good stead and that you were able to suss it out from the pics I posted. That's a nice circle, you posted a new idea, I cribbed from it and you cribbed back! How it is supposed to work. (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: Another Suspension
 
(...) I formally acknowledge that the LUGNET ToU applies to me as much as it does to anyone else, and that the post referenced (which has been cancelled) contained inappropriate and disrespectful remarks. I further acknowledge the authority of the (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(this is a repost with some inappropriate language and phrasing removed) (...) You posted a post that contained a word that clearly violates the ToU. It matters not whether you quoted it, or what context you used it in, that particular word is one (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: wish's
 
(...) Elsewhere he can, subject to the rules and regulations, if any, of whatever place he does so. Not here. Here he is subject to the ToS like everyone else. So, to say that "he can do whatever he wants" is false, unless you add the codicil, "and (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.348)

  Re: Getting diagonal track to line up properly?
 
(...) now. If you're a long time user, it works fine, although it's not extensible. New users would be well advised to look into TrackDraw instead... way more features, extensible menus, and the format is XML rather than obscure opaque object dumps (...) (20 years ago, 3-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) Still a violation and not just *my personal* interpretation. We already covered this the last time JoJo pulled this stunt. Quoting that word will not be tolerated. The rules are what they are. LUGNET is run the way it is run. Do not violate (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) This post was a violation of the ToS, regardless of where it was posted, even if only to admin.general (URL) it occured after he was warned that he needed to comply with the ToS or else. Hope that clears up your confusion. (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) True but irrelevant. You quoted, which was your choice. Therefore it was your action, your transgression. All else is smoke. (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  (canceled)
 
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) Fair point. Kelly is having some tech problems though, so please forgive if he just signs at the bottom till we get that fixed. (not speaking officially here, I haven't yet in this thread.) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) Do you insist on a speeding ticket every time you speed, or else repeal of all speeding laws? This "sometimes the admins spot it and sometimes they don't" is a red herring in my view. We spot what we spot, and we spot what people bring to our (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) I'm starting to come around to this way of thinking myself, actually. But how do we solve the legal liability problem? No other site seems to care about it as much, but part of why this policy is the way it is, (IIRC from the discussions back (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) That's exactly right. The note he posted excerpts from was not the first note, or even the second, but rather the third. The first note merely asked if he meant to use the word choices he used, and asked if he wanted to cancel. What I got back (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

  Re: Internationalization of the part library?
 
(...) Devil's advocate for a sec, were those NAME changes or CATEGORY changes? (...) That was my thinking too, but I have no stats to back it up. (...) To Jacob's point about keeping changes in sync, which I agree is a valid concern and would need (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.347)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR