Subject:
|
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 00:35:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
414 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David Koudys wrote:
> If LUGNET's law applies equally, then let the 'puter make it equal across the
> board.
Do you insist on a speeding ticket every time you speed, or else repeal of all
speeding laws?
This "sometimes the admins spot it and sometimes they don't" is a red herring in
my view. We spot what we spot, and we spot what people bring to our attention.
I'm all for reasoned consideration of programming changes in future but for now
the rules are what they are, and the system is what it is, and I am very tired
of being taken to task for trying to enforce them.
You and JoJo know better. Explain to me why both of you shouldn't be on
indefinite timeout for violating the rules, without any letters or notes warning
you or asking for cancels? Those notes from us are for people that need to
understand how things are where we think there may be some confusion about the
rules or guidelines. You have both wilfully violated the guidelines and I am
tired of that sort of button pushing too. Mostly you're a good guy Dave, snap
out of it.
I really don't have time for foolishness like this. That it got posted to
announce initially is, in my view, terrifically shameful. No community member
worthy of my respect would do that if he or she were thinking clearly.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) K, you are sooooo talking to the wrong guy about this one. If it were up to me, right now every bridge, every overhead sign, everything along the highway system, would have a photo radar installed. Give me 10 grande to install the first,then (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
