To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 12356
12355  |  12357
Subject: 
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:24:59 GMT
Viewed: 
4480 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Kelly McKiernan wrote:

?<snip>

> Do you (generic you, not just David) agree to abide by the administration's
> interpretation of LUGNET Terms of Use and Service? (For the moment, let's not
> get into the details of appeals processes and so on, which can be assumed to
> exist.) In other words, do you acknowledge that LUGNET administrators have the
> right and responsibility to enforce the Terms of Use document?


I won't speak for others, but I believe that the admins have the right and
responsibilty to enforce the ToU.  It is, after all, your house--should your ToU
in your house require all people to take of their shoes when they come in, then
the shoes must come off, and you have the 'responsibility and right' to enforce
this rule.

If there is vagueness where the rules are concerned, on the other hand, or the
rules are not applied equally, or there's 'double-speak' ('we don't censor but
you will have to censor or we will ban you') then these things need to be
addressed.

I support the admins but I am not a sycophant for the admins.

> If the answer is "no" then there's a whole lot more to be done than just put a
> word censor in place. Again, this may appear confrontational, but it's not meant
> to be; we simply need to have a very clear understanding of what LUGNET members
> expect from administrators, and vice versa.
> 
> - Kelly McKiernan
> LUGNET Administrator

Thanks for endeavouring to resolve this issue.

Dave K



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
 
(...) The current process is unweildy, but it's what we've got now. This issue, among others, is helping to define what the policy and process *should be* rather than what they are right now. But as it stands, that's what it is, and that's what we (...) (22 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

17 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR