Subject:
|
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:37:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
658 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > In lugnet.admin.general, David Koudys wrote:
> >
> > > Explain to me how I violated the ToU?
> >
> > You posted a post that contained a word that clearly violates the ToU. It
> > matters not whether you quoted it, or what context you used it in, that
> > particular word is one we come down hard on, consistently. We always have.
>
>
> And you very well know as a libertarian that one is not responsible for other
> people's actions.
True but irrelevant. You quoted, which was your choice. Therefore it was your
action, your transgression. All else is smoke.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Your interpretation. If the >'s were still in the post, and I didn't do any editing at all, and the entire post appeared with mine, then where does that get us. Furthermore, you are ignoring the greater issue where we say "Profanity bad! Must (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) And you very well know as a libertarian that one is not responsible for other people's actions. If someone sprays grafitti on a wall, yet I take a picture of that, I am not responsible for the grafitti. Just as if I quote a person who has (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
