Subject:
|
Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:45:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
362 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Dave Schuler wrote:
> I confess that I haven't scoured Richard postings in admin.general, but did
> he really show contempt for the TOS there? How so? Did he post auction
> bulletins and political rants? He may have, for all I know, but I wasn't
> aware that he'd done so.
This post was a violation of the ToS, regardless of where it was posted, even if
only to admin.general
http://news.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=11853
and it occured after he was warned that he needed to comply with the ToS or
else.
Hope that clears up your confusion.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Well, the relevant part from (URL) is this: "His attempt to run around the suspension by posting exclusively in admin.general..." Len identifies Richard's choice to post exclusively in admin.general (which he was explicitly required to do) as (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) Well, I was responding to the phrasing in (URL) this post> in which you wrote If you refuse to acknowledge that the ToS applies to you (a la Marchetti), then you will be suspended until you acknowledge it. I inferred from this (perhaps (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
