|
 | | Re: pictures?
|
| (...) My camera's broken. Scott got swamped and hasn't had time to upload. Can't speak for everyone else. But it was a very nice layout! Lots of trains running at once (up to 6 counting the two main lines, the trolley line, Scott's local loop, (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| |
|  
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | christian morals are inferior to tolerant morals
|
| (...) Why not? You'll have to present an argument other than "from authority" to convince me differently. Assuming we've named all the stakeholders, and they're all consenting adults who actually consented (posit this for the sake of the argument, (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | inconsequential creator
|
| (...) No valid reason not to accept that the universe was created rather than always existed or spontaneously appeared... AS LONG AS that creator has had no other effect. As soon as you claim the creator has had other effects which are apparent or (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: well wishes /coverage
|
| (...) Thanks for the suggestions all, I think I'll just try to do a transcript. Live if I can, else posted later. As for external questions, if you have one just bursting inside you, email someone (other than me! I ignore too much email as it is due (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: well wishes /coverage
|
| (...) I like that idea... (...) What I meant was that because BL has a chat area it would be a good place for the dynamic part. But because it also has a chat buffer capture (if you're a moderator) I could capture what all transpired and repost it (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: well wishes /coverage
|
| (...) Yes... (...) I would be glad to type faster than I usually do as long as people could tolerate more than my usual number of misteaks. (1) :-), assuming that the facilities exist (last year I was able to leverage a network connection that was (...) (22 years ago, 14-Jul-02, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) It is not possible to meaningfully talk about events prior to the big bang (1) at this time. Period. With or without religion. (except in the negative sense of saying that we can't talk about them as we have no frame of reference and no way to (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) And you in turn would be mistaken to think I had done so. I've studied the whole bible (and read a fair bit elsewhence) not just that one particular OT book. It's just that Job sums up your god quite nicely for me. Most of the rest is smoke or (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Description of MLCad extensions available now
|
| (...) Um, submission of a part subjects the part to the LDraw.org license, or is intended to. The parts library is protected by an overall license, or is intended to be in the future once the license is in place (that this effort has appeared to be (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) I judge the nature of your god by the evidence presented. The ends do not justify the means, and there is no possible justification for your god's persistent torture of Job. If the bible is revealed truth, your god isn't a very good (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) A creator is not a theory. It fails the falsifyability test. You seem not to understand this... (...) The evidence indicates support for the Big Bang (I think that's a misnomer in modern terminology, but OK...) and as Dave! is relating quite (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: slight
|
| (...) Ya, me too. Of course, I may have read a different version than you... in my view Job should never have been allowed to remain in the bible as it spells things out quite clearly for those paying attention. It reveals the true nature of the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) I'm OK with that so far as it goes... Tribes in the stone age ARE less developed. And I am perfectly OK characterising my life (and my society) as "better" than theirs. We have LEGO(r). They don't. QED. Next! ++Lar (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: New legend is up
|
| In lugnet.general, Allan Bedford writes: <LEGO(r) should consider rereleasing sets in other colors> I don't think anyone would argue this point. Ben aus BS in particular would agree with you and has passionately argued against the same color in the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: New legend is up
|
| First let me say that I would like to see some smaller sets rereleased as well as large ones. Sets the size of Guarded Inn, Pizza to Go, etc are the backbone of the line and sell in larger quantities as new sets. So I have no argument with the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.254)
|
|
| | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism
|
| (...) Well, people have been saying that all along!!!! What took you so long? Science in general has nothing to say about faith based beliefs other than "they are outside the purview of science". You can't use science to prove or disprove them. But (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.253)
|
