|
 | | Re: Best Train to Purchase for a Newbie? (Poll)
|
| (...) Yep. While WE probably all can (and will) fix the problems with the ATSF rolling stock, it may not be the best set for a newbie, who won't know what to do (or have the big collection of parts to do it with) and thus might get frustrated. (...) (22 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|  
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | ldraw.org running correctly?
|
| Are other people having trouble getting to ldraw.org or is it just me? I would have expected to see some posts about it if it was having trouble... and I'm not... so it's most likely me. Please email me to avoid clutter, and I'll summarize. Thanks! (22 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: MOC - small train engine shed
|
| (...) The canonical thing to do seems to be use 12V track rails and tinypeg train wheels to ride on top of them to hold the traveling gantry... If that wasn't what you were asking, oops! (22 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: new waggons by Huw Millington
|
| (...) Well, since you begged... :-) Here's an announcement of a new design... (URL) have some variants and doodles (for lots of other equipment) which I need to get some pics of. I was lucky enough to be in Portland OR earlier this week and visited (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.town)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: NWBrickCon in the news
|
| (...) Yes. I too (as David S does) once in a while indulge in a little one upmanship, since I lived in Ontario for 1.5 years, my earliest bricks are vintage 1967, obtained at the Simpson Sears. One of the many reasons I loved living in Canada for a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) I totally agree with the above two paragraphs, whether they're applied to you, or to someone else, anyone doing these things is doing off-topic.debate a significant disservice in my view, and really ought not to do that. What I would question (...) (22 years ago, 5-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: Lando poll
|
| (...) Well, :-) Yellow skin is the color of jaundice. Last time I checked, minifigs didn't even HAVE livers so that would be your canonical extreme cause of jaundice, ne? :-) (22 years ago, 5-Oct-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> No argument with any of that (you'll never see ME arguing the case that a show "ought to be banned" rather than "just turn the channel on it" so the off button is the completely appropriate (...) (22 years ago, 5-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Thank you for the clarification, on rereading I see that they are your words, my apologies. Point still stands though. (...) A list neither IS nor ISN'T a sequence (or chain of inferences, note the difference). Further it neither IS nor ISN'T (...) (22 years ago, 3-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) David please do not mark up my words as you did in the next paragraph. It is confusing to the readership and extremely poor form. (...) Everything in parenthesis was added by David, and is incorrectly associated with the same inference. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) I'm not sure I agree here. A bit of logic might help. If I assert: (-> == implies ) A -> B and B -> C and C -> D are all true , and thus A -> D is true and provide facts or evidence FAB in support of A -> B FBC in support of B -> C FCD in (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| Snipped for effect. (...) "Again" as in; you previously had it figured out, seemed to have gone through a patch just now where you didn't, and now you do have it figured out "again". NOT as in; you got into it with him before... Helps? (...) As far (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| (...) Well you seemed to have figured that out (again?? this time?? (1) ) faster than I used to do.. only what, 40-50 posts in that thread between the two of you? Contrast that with me and he(2), we've managed to spin out hundreds of posts in one (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| | Re: John Leo's opinion of "The West Wing"
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> My point stands. You're welcome to get your ideas about reality from wherever you like, including from TV shows that force feed bias while pretending to be balanced... Just don't cite them in (...) (22 years ago, 2-Oct-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.262)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.261)
|
