LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 3821 – 3840 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Sorry if I haven't been clear. I don't have any expectation that the market will provide me whatever I fancy, in this market or any other. What my expectation is, though, is that for it to be a free market, there cannot be unreasonable (...) (22 years ago, 25-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
(...) Penance. No, to pay penance you have to admit you sinned, I believe. Scott has made no such admission, and in fact, according to some, he's worse than ever. (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Because you have a coercive monopoly. A government granted that company a monopoly... But you know this already, Dave! What are you up to? (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime?
(...) Chris, you're wasting your breath with Scott. Many (but unfortunately not all) of us now ignore Scott... you might consider it too. But to answer your question, yes, Scott does think that way about the US, by and large. (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
(...) Harsh... Not very PC of you to point that out. I must say, for a sec there, I thought RM was talking about HERE in his quote about it being war... for after all, he does not play well with others here, does he? Consider this post (URL) the big (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) I'll let the market (of ideas) decide. Oh wait, it did! You lost, Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Keeping tabs on a Useful Idiot
(...) So you (presumably being a friend, or at least sympathetic to some of his views) are then OK with out and out lying as long as it's in support of your cause? How morally relativistic of you, Dave! Where would you draw the line, exactly, at (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Does such an island exist? As far as I can tell, all land on this planet is either claimed by some particular government (and thus ought not to be hived off without the acquiescence of that government, or of the landowners or at least of (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Keeping tabs on a Useful Idiot
I can't vouch for the veracity of this site... (URL) I find it interesting that it even exists. (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Preface: Plowed ground alert. I probably shouldn't have posted a flurry of responses, just summarised and let it go. This has been discussed before at length. That said, onward. (...) Not in and of itself. But if you had a grand scheme for a $1000 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) There are sufficiently high barriers to entry (the 200+ nations collude together to prevent new entrants) that your assertion that "the market is free" is false, Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Sorry, David, you were reading too fast. You missed the point. I speak of a marketplaceof ideas themselves, a marketplace IN government systems. But be that as it may, past reading in this group will show that I don't agree that government (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) Sure it does. You can't argue that we have the right of choice if there's no free market (of ideas, or of systems) to choose from, except unless you argue that we have to lump the choices, constrained as they are by the International (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) The problem is there's no free market in governmental systems at the moment, and the present players collude to keep it that way. (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) What do these goods have to do with taxes? Except for the second order effect of a legal framework to protect contracts, that is. There's no reason any of these have to be government provided. You picked the wrong goods to praise government (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: And now for something completely different...
(...) there seems to be a great deal of material here, and what I did read seemed well thought out. (URL) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) How does one exit? What if the contract was abrogated by one side (the side with the big guns)? (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: I'm just going to take a back seat.... Re: You Can Lead A Horse To Water....
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> Thanks for this cite, David, it's interesting and thought provoking reading. (...) other approach, it isn't always the best choice. Let's assume for this post that it's our problem to solve (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Excellent summation of truths and falsehoods about our little war
Pitched at students, it's still a good summation of a lot of the arguements flying around. It's also a good scorecard you can to use to evaluate the players here and their relative grips on reality. (note that RM fails point 3 badly) (URL) that (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) (URL) didn't because it's too early to know whether there's anything to this. Maybe it's a false alarm... Of course with our great powers of fakery, all part of the Vast Conspiracy(tm), it wouldn't take more than a day or two to knock up a 100 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

More: Next Page >>