Debate : 19773


Off-Topic / Debate / 19773	19772 \| 19774

Subject:	Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:52:16 GMT
Viewed:	1138 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bruce Schlickbernd writes: > Then you are doomed to a lifetime of futile frustration and tilting at > windmills. I already said that morally you may be correct, but practically > what is the alternative? Society grinds to a halt every time someone is > born? If you reject the possibility of being born into a contract, then you > have the ultimate right: modify the contract and accept it or beat feet. The problem is there's no free market in governmental systems at the moment, and the present players collude to keep it that way.

Message has 3 Replies:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) That doesn't really address the topic at hand (and perhaps that was your intent). -->Bruce<-- (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) I would surmise that "Fre Market" and "Governmental Systems" are exclusive. There has to be oversight to "Free Market" in order to maintain the safety and health of those involved in the Free Market system--hence Gov't. I live in a reasonably (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) The market is plenty free--we have 200+ nations to choose from! The fact that no nation has arisen to suit the desires of every last person is irrelevant. That's the market in action. Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) As I said, morally you may be correct, but practically, I see no better way to proceed. It's not an ideal contract, because you are bound by your predessor's contract, not one you made for yourself. I must admit I categorically reject the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search