Subject:
|
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:07:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
890 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> I presume you're talking about the government in the latter case, but can
> you rephrase that without the "at gunpoint" phrase? There's no initiation
> of force involved; it's simple enforcement of social contract. You may
> disagree with the contract, but until you exit from it, you are subject to it.
How does one exit? What if the contract was abrogated by one side (the side
with the big guns)?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
