Results 1221 – 1240 of about 86000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: A discovery? and part 3475
|
| (...) [snipped description and part-file] Yep, this is how I usually build curved stuff - use primitives to get the correct points, inline them and move the points around as necessary. In this particular case (a full circular ring), a way to avoid (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
how, link
(score: 2.537)
|
|
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) I also agree about how it looks...which is basically why I don't use an associate link on the NQC site (1). Dave (1) Acutally, I even debated about putting anything at all on the NQC site about my book. (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.537)
|
|
| | Re: Southport Lego Show 20th May 2000
|
| (...) Happy to! (URL) Let me know what you think, I've added some basic formatting to it, and the only bit that I edited was the "web-page to be announced" bit. If you look at (URL) you'll see the raw FTX for the page - it should be fairly simple to (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.537)
|
|
| | S'more "newbie welcome" thoughts
|
| We started talking about this before but here are a few more thoughts regarding how to make newbies more comfy with lugnet, and making a first-time visit be a nice and not a frightening experience. I understand that Jeremy Sproat or Todd or both (?) (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.537)
|
|
| |
|
how, deep
(score: 2.537)
|
|
| | Re: I'm back...
|
| (...) For what? Just curious - and how do you know? <snip> (...) I do not think its that deep, I was more curious if *you* personally thought you were going about it in the correct way. I take it you do, because you see it as a good way to get (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
how, deep
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | Re: Article rating?
|
| (...) Agreed. (...) Disagree, I do not see this behaviour in NS 4.7. The rated page is the same page as the unrated so you only need to go back once. (...) YES. I trust that it took my rating into account, I don't need proof, I'll hit refresh if I (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | Re: Ebay acution - Potential Fraud?
|
| Well, I understand this happening. I have done it to other people's pictures and they have done it to mine. I never considered it a major problem, but I have only once had an email from somebody. That person was mad and I told him it happens all the (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | Re: 8480 Technic Shuttles
|
| Is it time to re-hash the 'is this a sale or an auction' debate? Although its been done to [near] death, I don't think a concensus was reached on the topic. From (URL) Todd says: "- Sealed-bid auctions are "technically" (by name) auctions but in (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-01
|
| (...) You are welcome, no need to thank me for it, we do this for the fun of it! (...) Well, I have used my program to find it, but the actual image is from ldglite or l3glite, I'm NOT sure which. I used this image, because you can clearlly (maybe (...) (24 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | Re: Article rating?
|
| (...) Actually, if you are rating individual articles, it seems a bit of a pain to use it. The reason is the time lag is unacceptable. Clicking on the submit rating or change rating button causes the entire page to be refreshed. This alone takes (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | How to change the baud rate of Interactive C
|
| Interactive C communicates with the 68HC11 at 9600 baud, but if you'd like to change that -- say, to maintain interactivity over a slow RF link -- it is easy to hack the software, at least in Mac version 3.1. I'm indebted to Randy Sargent who sent (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.536)
|
|
| | Re: SF convention
|
| Chris, Scott & all: No problem. I don't have any train or monorail sets. Like I said, most of what I will bring is in my big ships. So the probably the best thing to do is to list off what we want to see (building wise) and then we all draw from a (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| |
|
how, deep
(score: 2.535)
|
|
| | Re: SF convention
|
| Chris, Scott & all: No problem. I don't have any train or monorail sets. Like I said, most of what I will bring is in my big ships. So the probably the best thing to do is to list off what we want to see (building wise) and then we all draw from a (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| |
|
how, deep
(score: 2.535)
|
|
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) I don't really understand how the associates stuff works: if no one collects the referal fee, doesn't Amazon just keep it as extra profit for themselves? Certainly the authors don't collect a smaller royalty if a referal fee is given? So I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.535)
|
|
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.535)
|
|
| | Re: No Comment
|
| (...) I knew I could count on an ex-IBM'er to come up with a good non-word! :) :) OK, so how about "Unrated" in place of "No Comment" if the article has not yet been rated by you, and "Unrate" in place of "No Comment" if you're revisiting it later (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.535)
|
|
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.535)
|
|
| | Re: O'Reilly book news
|
| (...) What happened (apparently) is that LEGO now has their cake and eats it too. This makes me sick. I just discovered their page devoted to (quote) "some 'introductory' Books about LEGO MINDSTORMS." There I see two books, Jonathan's O'Reilly and (...) (25 years ago, 7-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dear-lego) !
| |
|
how, link
(score: 2.534)
|
|
| | Re: I'm back...
|
| (...) Hence the futility of banning/repeat-cancelling Mr Moulton. I would never defend his past actions, but I see no point in continually bringing them up. Especially when he actually has some good stuff to show off, despite the rat-baggage. Who (...) (23 years ago, 25-May-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
how, deep
(score: 2.534)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
