LUGNET News : Search Results: dead legends Beneke


Search Results: dead legends Beneke

Results 6161 – 6180 of 6562.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Cthulego Rising
Since my dark ages ended I've been meaning to build this. A MOC where the LEGO Adventurers meet H.P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu Mythos. Cthulego is born! The futility of mini-figs fighting against the horrors of un-named creatures, things from the ancient (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.build, FTX) !!

dead
(score: 0.900)

		Re: Maze robot testing
(...) The only time I ran it I used 1x4's and tested in a "U" shape (both clockwise & counterclockwise) on my kitchen floor. This worked great, until event day when the floor friction fouled me up (I may have to cobble up a test system like Bryan (...) (19 years ago, 1-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

dead
(score: 0.900)

		Re: STUDS: Return from the dead
(...) (URL) I've built a largish Warhammer Templar Keep out of MB, and have been staffing it (...) (URL) now, this one's more a sneak peek than an exposition, and its MB) ;-) Richard Still baldly going... (19 years ago, 11-Feb-06, to lugnet.loc.au)

dead
(score: 0.899)

		broken RCX
Some of you may have been aware of my "posessed" rcx. It was a little screwed up. When I powered it on, sometimes it would just start up motor output A for no reason at all. It would run motor A indefinitly if I let it. Sometimes running a program (...) (19 years ago, 4-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

dead
(score: 0.899)

		The NXT step for HiTechnic?
Browsing around the HiTechnic site I noticed this update: (URL) So the NXT digital interface is already showing some of its strengths it seems. I was always surprised that John could even get 3 degrees of accuracy out of that sensor, but with 1 (...) (19 years ago, 4-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.899)

		Re: broken RCX
Well, after a little looking around on Lugnet & googling "RCX internals" I found that one problem when people take apart RCXs is that a small surface mount fuse on the board is blown. After poking around with my el-cheapo test light, I found that (...) (19 years ago, 5-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

dead
(score: 0.899)

		Re: It's awfully quiet in here
(...) Well, I'm mostly quiet because I'm just coming back from a set of robot games in Northern Indiana, where I was only able to enter two robots... and one of them didn't run at all due to a dead (& I mean DEAD) RCX. So anybody want to help out (...) (19 years ago, 27-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.899)

		Re: Danish cartoons outrage some Moslem groups and nations
(...) Would ther have been a response if there were anti-jewish cartoons published? More than likely. And the response would have happened when the cartoons came out back in September, instead of sitting on it whilst shipping danish flags to the (...) (19 years ago, 9-Feb-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

dead
(score: 0.898)

		Re: Lego Brokeback Mountain
How could you have not gone with Brokebrick Mountain?! :) I haven't seen the movie, so I can't comment on how well these scenes capture the feel of the movie, but there's some nice elements here. I like the use of the new studless trans-orange 1x1 (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-06, to lugnet.western, FTX)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
(...) I'd go further than that - I may be wrong here, but AFAIK professional roboticists largely consider dead reckoning to be a losing game, an amateur red-herring that you can waste all the time and money you want on and it will still never work (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
(...) I'll chime in here (I lurk way too much): Given the choice, I'd like to see included in NXT a software module for coding dead-reckoning navigation for turtle-type robots, kind of like here: (URL) since the NXT motors have built-in encoders, (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
In lugnet.robotics, Justin Fisher wrote: <snip> (...) When I was a mentor for a local FLL team, I was so hard pressed to convince the kids that 'dead reconing' wasn't the way to go. THey had the entire program coded like 'go straight for 10 seconds, (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
(...) This sounds like a good demo that someone within the MDP program can create (hint, hint, wink wink, nudge, nudge). Show the difference between navigating through a maze using (1) the 'dead reconing' method, (2) the ultrasound sensor and the (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
(...) Having given this a bit more thought, the code would be almost the same. Even though the encoders are built-in, there's no guarantee that the motors themselves are matched. You would still need control loops to ensure that the motors rotate at (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		Re: turtle coding kit (Re: How would we (the rest of us) communicate ideas to the MDP?)
(...) The question is just how much of this is handled at what level within the NXT firmware & software. I'd be surprised if LEGO doesn't do something with the built-in encoders - after all, they put them there. the question is how much. The (...) (19 years ago, 22-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)

dead
(score: 0.897)

		Re: Question for builders
(...) I LOVE the tank treads. MANY of my unsuccessful robots use them for the Rx games. If I recall, the bot that was more or less KING of the Hill had 3 PAIRS of tank treads. I mean, look at this GREAT pic of me, holding my WINNING robot entry. (...) (19 years ago, 25-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

dead
(score: 0.896)

		lugnet website dead?
I noticed that brickjournal issue 3 is out... why hasnt the website been updated? (URL) Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland \|\| diablod3@gmail.com "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in (...) (19 years ago, 18-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)

dead
(score: 0.895)

		Re: lugnet website dead?
(...) Actually a set of factors have come in that have made things a bit of a challenge in this: 1. The BrickJournal page on LEGOFan.org is not administered by me. As part of LEGOFan.org's website, admin duties are usually handled by the webmaster (...) (19 years ago, 18-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)

dead
(score: 0.895)

		Re: lugnet website dead?
(...) Why not just register your own domain, and have everyone link to it? At least then you'll be under full control of everything, just whack LEGOFan and lugnet admins to link to you. (19 years ago, 19-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)

dead
(score: 0.895)

		Re: lugnet website dead?
(...) Well, I do own the domain. However, the time to maintain a site is not something I can easily give - I have committments to editing and running BrickJournal, running my local club and helping out another club, and now planning BrickFest, not (...) (19 years ago, 19-Mar-06, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal)

dead
(score: 0.895)

More: Next Page >>