Results 5821 – 5840 of 6562.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Clams got legs! Unfortunately, your disclaimed/declaimed/declammed non-sequitor doesn't. Unless I reply like a fool, in which case....oh no.... -->Bruce<-- clamming up... (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Looks like mollusc has run out. Actually, when I first read your post, I saw "declaimed" as "declammed," so the non-sequitur was borne of a misreading of your sequitur. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Lee, this is an interesting argument against moral relativism - but I doubt Dave is arguing on behalf of moral relativisim. You have assign this belief to him, and then proceeded to attack that belief, all the while you ignore the discussion (...) (20 years ago, 14-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) ...until it becomes agnosticism, the only true non-religion. The fundamental difference between atheists and agnostics is that atheism, like all religions, makes firm dogmatic claims regarding the existence of a supernatural being and the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) I could say the same: A-gnostic: without knowledge of god(s) A-theist: without belief in god(s) (...) Those are essentially different ways of saying the same thing. Anything that can serve as proof for the one group should serve equally well (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) Some quotes from Wikipedia that may be illuminating (or confusing depending on if you can keep track of it all): Some atheists distinguish between two variants: Weak atheism, or negative atheism, is the standpoint that there is no reason to (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) Those definitions stray from Huxley's (URL) original definition> (no offense intended to atheists or agnostics by the domain, but it was the most complete Huxley quote I could find), as he considered himself to be neither a theist nor an (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.964)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) I'm a little confused since the definitions you choose to quote above have utterly nothing to do with the link you provide. That is talking about his intellectual approach and not atheism at all, except in the most passing manner possible. (...) (20 years ago, 17-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) Actually you're confusing terms here. Agnostics believe that the existance of God is "inherently unknowable" whereas (most) atheists believe that God's existance is "unproven". There is a relativly small faction of atheists (known as hard (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Many people view atheism as a belief system rather than a religion. Your points still stand, nonetheless, but I did want to point it out. I'll go farther, and state that I feel that people who consistently call atheism a religion are, in my (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) All religions are belief systems, but not all belief systems are religions. (...) Nor does it necessarily mean that it is. (...) No, I didn't miss it, I just wasn't convinced. My take then was that you were arguing by assertion. I'll take this (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) The problem you're citing is basically one of semantics, so I don't think it's a good refutation of Lee's posited mathematical absolute. Whether you refer to "four" as 10 or IV or cuatro or 4, the underlying numeric principle is the same, and (...) (20 years ago, 18-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| | Re: A Question
|
| (...) >Do you think LEGO might release some more sets in the current sub-themes ? From what I heard, Orient Expedition is dead. Next year's theme will be Dinos-in-the-jungle. Jindroush, www.kostky.org (20 years ago, 7-Oct-04, to lugnet.adventurers)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| | Re: English CD?
|
| (...) Hi Larry, THanks again for the help. Since the Cybermaster product was never available in the US, I assumed that calling the US LEGO consumer affairs would be a dead end. I'll give it a try, maybe it will work. Kevin (20 years ago, 7-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics.cybermaster)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.963)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
