Results 2821 – 2840 of about 6600.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | what makes a legend?
|
| We're having a debate here in the ABS-paved halls of LEGO Direct that I'd like to throw open to the community. The topic is: what makes a LEGO Legend a legend? Or, more precisely, if we cannot bring back a set precisely as it was (or pretty darn (...) (23 years ago, 19-Oct-01, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
| |
|  
legends
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) Why not do it on your own? You and the others have already attacked Richard and Pawel enough to illicit this kind of reply. Were I Richard, I'd feel the same way. Instead of unifying the community, you (and some others) are the ones dividing (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) Its a community! How can we be a community when there are cheifs that make everyone else wait on them? You cannot run a community by going by your leisure! (...) We had wanted to try to re-format what groundwork was already layed. Ihop said (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) We arnt TRYING to turn it gaming! Long ago, i had wanted to. No, we want to take the community to the next level, instead of keeping it just a little story-board basically. Why not have tips-n-tricks? Helpful articles? On-Line displays? Role (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| All you guys want to do with CW is turn it into a game forum, and CW was NEVER about gaming. That's what I don't understand. CW was NEVER about gaming. Never! I also personally find it annoying that no one has responded directly to Pawel's post (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) This is one of the most sensible posts of this entire thread, IMO. I'm not a Castle-head, but I've been following the discussion here -- half entertained, half annoyed by the level of whining I'm reading. In my view, Jojo's point makes so much (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: what makes a legend?
|
| (...) Changes that keep the spirit and character of a set 'alive' are fine (i.e. the wheels and the hollow studs on the minifig head). To use another's example, making a #375/6075 Yellow Castle with the various wall bricks are not. I'd have to go (...) (23 years ago, 21-Oct-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
legends
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) I think this stems from the fact that there was discussion about allowing the evolution of Castleworld, but different people with different ideas about what should be done next, with their own individual pre-concieved ideas. You are right that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: What makes a legend?
|
| (...) Indeed!!!!!!!! A dark Gray 6075 castle would be phenomenal. (URL) wouldn’t be a be in the Legends line, but instead a ‘re-mastered classic!’) And along with a service pack or minifig pack would be most excellent. (URL) (or) (URL) I honestly do (...) (23 years ago, 20-Oct-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
legends
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| _It doesn't belong to you!!! (...) They said if someone else was interested in it, they could take control of it. When someone tried, they refused. (...) Oooh, what if we went back on something? (...) Just leave, right, then? Go make a new board. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: what makes a legend?
|
| (...) <snip> A great question. To me, it has a lot less to do with nostalgia, and more with set complexity. I do understand the current catch-22 that TLC is facing these days with its juniorization policy of sets (feeling the need to hook younger (...) (23 years ago, 21-Oct-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
legends
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| Hello! (...) Of course the 'Castle World community' must not be confused with the 'LEGO Castle community'. There *may* be people out there who build castles, churches, medieval towns, chariots and battle machines or even just collect LEGO Castle (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle) !
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.401)
|
|
| | Re: The Thread is Dead
|
| Richard, Alex and all: I think you all have valid viewpoints of these issues. I do not think that arguing will benefit lugnet at all. People have made up their minds on what they will do. Arguing back and forth does not change this, it only clutters (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) On that note: It was always my feeling that Castle World was doomed from the get-go. It was a great idea, but having static HTML pages that are editable by 1 or a small group of admins just won't live forever. Eventually, you'll have to cut (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) The idea is to take Castle World to the next level. Instead of just a site for telling storys, why not have tips and tricks on: Castle layout Castle construction Etc. I forget who had the Guild idea (much credit to them) and i was thinking (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) I proposed the square-grid map. Im the one trying to get a whole starship-thing going. Ive already got rules that are re-written- just not on the site. Your "administrating realms" sounds like a good idea. You travel out, and what you have (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) Actually, your imput seems very welcome. As an onlooker who has "loosely followed" much of the discussion, I've attempted to kee a passive voice on the whole affair, since frankly, the community is being divided enough already. Richard: you (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) No, it's not. I think you have some confusion between trademarks and copyright. The term "castle world" would not be covered by copyright. It has never been claimed (let alone registered) as a trademark until today, when you've tried to use it (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| (...) Oh, the official "last name" adressal? Oooh, were gettin SERIOS here... (...) Nobody should. And nobody should have rights over anyone elses time either. (...) He created it, yeah, and so on. But hes barely posted. Hes lurking. So we should (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
|
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
| Wow! This is the most intense argument I’ve ever seen on lugnet. Not that there haven’t been other ones that I don’t know about. You see I’m a strictly .castle lurker. Now I know that the opinion of one lurker doesn’t count for much so I’m not going (...) (21 years ago, 3-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.400)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
