Results 1741 – 1760 of about 6600.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
| Sorry for prolonging this, but a few things in the post below trouble me. I have no vested interest in Sci-Brick, nor do I have a specific problem with any of the parties involved, but when I detect illogic, and stated aims in disparity with actions (...) (20 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
| |
|  
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: new waggons by Huw Millington
|
| (...) Hi Larry, thanks for the link! Nice John Deere tractors, that remind me on the old tractor used as load here... (sorry for bringing this link once more.) ;-) (URL) this site: (URL) you may know, most of my models are somewhat related to rural (...) (22 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.town)
| |
|
beneke
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) I'm a little confused since the definitions you choose to quote above have utterly nothing to do with the link you provide. That is talking about his intellectual approach and not atheism at all, except in the most passing manner possible. (...) (20 years ago, 17-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
| -snip- (...) Do you really think I'm trying to control the discussion here? Honestly.. is that what you think? By "legitimate" - I am only meaning that someone should not show themselves to represent the whole group when they only represent (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: You have got to be kidding me...
|
| (...) Ha ha ha, well, I don't want to beat a dead horse here, but the thought occurred to me that this almost seems to go into a realm related to Moral Relativism. Instead of seeing morals as relative, we are seeing the scientific evidence in (...) (20 years ago, 22-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Are *we* part of TLG's problem?
|
| (...) I've been wondering about this for a while. I've played with LEGO my whole life, but I didn't get my first Legoland set (Space Dart I Value Pack from 1984) until my 7th birthday. It wasn't until 1986 when I was 9 years old that I really got (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: SciBrick is looking for you!
|
| All, Keith makes several valid points, and I would like to expound upon them. I have been passively monitoring LUGNET for several years. I just finished reading this entire thread. I must congratulate all of the participants for finally penetrating (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) Those definitions stray from Huxley's (URL) original definition> (no offense intended to atheists or agnostics by the domain, but it was the most complete Huxley quote I could find), as he considered himself to be neither a theist nor an (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) Some quotes from Wikipedia that may be illuminating (or confusing depending on if you can keep track of it all): Some atheists distinguish between two variants: Weak atheism, or negative atheism, is the standpoint that there is no reason to (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) I could say the same: A-gnostic: without knowledge of god(s) A-theist: without belief in god(s) (...) Those are essentially different ways of saying the same thing. Anything that can serve as proof for the one group should serve equally well (...) (20 years ago, 16-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is religion dead in the water?
|
| (...) ...until it becomes agnosticism, the only true non-religion. The fundamental difference between atheists and agnostics is that atheism, like all religions, makes firm dogmatic claims regarding the existence of a supernatural being and the (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Looks like mollusc has run out. Actually, when I first read your post, I saw "declaimed" as "declammed," so the non-sequitur was borne of a misreading of your sequitur. Dave! (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| | Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
|
| (...) Clams got legs! Unfortunately, your disclaimed/declaimed/declammed non-sequitor doesn't. Unless I reply like a fool, in which case....oh no.... -->Bruce<-- clamming up... (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
dead
(score: 0.455)
|
|
| |
|
legends
(score: 0.455)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
