|
| |
|  
horse
(score: 0.356)
|
|
 | | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
| (...) I seem to recall General Motors making a promise that they were going to release the new Camaro by "x" date....well, turns out that they didn't make it. The result? An advertising campaign featuring the "human caring factor" of a manager who (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Just say no
|
| (...) Seems pretty clear to me (1). He's asking why make things easier for the hordes of people that clearly are little no threat whatever in order to be a bit less PC to people that fit the threat profile more closely? Quoting from the part you (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
| (...) I'm glad I could be of service. ;) But I'm afraid you're mixing up so many things I really don't wish to sort it out for you. And better never, ever mention George Doubble-You to "Old Europeans" like me ... (...) Try something stronger than (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Using Firefox (printing clickable images)
|
| (...) I don't want to blame anyone, my question was "how do I get FF to do X" rather than "FF won't do X, it's broken". I really want to switch but this feature requires me to use IE so I'm 98% FF using not 100%, if you see what I mean. (and I know, (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
| (...) I totally agree. Frankly, if I'm going to be missing out on a MOC announcement because a moderator was presumptuous enough to delete it, then I'll be sticking to the forum where that doesn't happen. If this is a misunderstanding of the CSF (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Whatever happened... LETS end this.....
|
| (...) [snip] There is so much interesting discussion in this thread, I couldn't decide which post I wanted to reply to most. But I picked this one because of this one phrase. I often find that while sitting in front of the PC to respond to a post, I (...) (22 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: MOC: Space Wagon
|
| (...) Tony, I really like this ship... its refreshing to see a moc using mostly "old school" building techniques & pieces. I like the idea of doing retro-nostalgia inspired MOCs. I think it would be fun to do modern interpretations of the classic (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
| (...) Absolutely. The mods will rule with unjust elitism! But seriously, the mods we have are well suited at making their points clear. If honesty is a bad thing, then so be it. (...) Well, perhaps that's not the best way to word it. And, after (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
| (...) That's not how I took it. But look at the way it was explained to the Germans via their liason (thanks to Rene's post): (URL) Doesn't get more clear than that IMO. JOHN (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
| (...) First, thanks for visiting. It's more than some others have admitted to doing. (...) Heh, humor. I love it. CSF's and yours. (...) This is very Andy Rooney-ish. But I should mention that rules aren't invalidated by humor. (...) This applies to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
| (...) my only real complaint so far is that I cannot find the scroll bars against the black background. Makes it hard to read longer threads (...) I have no problem following a set of rules that make sense and are orderly. (...) Oops, I didn't mean (...) (22 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | fun model building
|
| howdy, writing this post to say that I had some fun last night (Wednesday night) making some models (MOC's). I started the evening designing a fire truck (basically from scratch) using the "chasis" of the ladder truck from the 6382 Fire (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
horse
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: Interesting point of view, Rene!
|
| (...) Perhaps I just read all statements from Lego as possibles, whereas others read them as 100% definites. Let's look at Jake's post: (URL) As many of you have seen from the leaked pictures online, we have released a > (...) Interpretation: Fact. (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Whatever happened...
|
| What happened to the old days? I don't remember Lego being this un-"fun": -People never used to complain MORE of a cool set was coming along. Sets weren't "collectable" and no one worried about "exclusivity". -Scalping wasn't an accepted way of (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto) !!
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| In lugnet.lego, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <snip> (...) No, it was exhausted. They are mixing up more (at the expense of Maersk). (...) This has nothing to do with marketing per se. If it had never been mentioned that this was the end of the line for (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| |
|
horse
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| In lugnet.lego, Kelly McKiernan wrote: <various snippaging> (...) (URL) From the above post by Jake: "This set uses …drum roll please… Maersk blue! In fact, the run of this new set uses all the Maersk blue ABS pellets we have left. That means that (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 0.356)
|
