|
| |
|   all, property (score: 0.891) |
|
 | | Re: ------( Terms of use for lugnet.com )------
|
| (...) <snip> About the terms of use... Wow, those are a mouthful, aren't they? USENET doesn't have any. Why should LUGNET? Well, if you read them carefully, you'll see that a lot of thought (and discussion, they've been modified somewhat from the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.people.newbie)
| |
|   all, rights, property (score: 0.890) |
|
| |
|   all, rights, property (score: 0.890) |
|
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.890) |
|
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| This is post to sum up my ideas before I pop off on holiday for a few days. 1) Consider making the license apply to more than just parts or the parts library. This would allow things like documentation or software to be distributed too. 2) I would (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.890) |
|
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.890) |
|
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) <snip> I've taken the chance to read the threads mentioned earlier in this thread. And I've made a version of the license (based on the previous Steve Bliss version) that handles both author->ldraw.org requirements and author->EndUser (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.889) |
|
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.889) |
|
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) I also can't understand the reason for two licenses. With one license ldraw.org and the community as a whole gain the same rights to modify/redistribute/buildupon the community provided library. The license described in (URL) I think be ideal (...) (22 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.889) |
|
| |
|   all, property (score: 0.889) |
|
 | | Re: License Intent
|
| (...) I can't see the reason for this. Why shouldn't any user of the parts files have the same rights as LDraw.org? What special permissions does LDraw.org need, which it would be problematic to grant to all the users? Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.889) |
|
 | | Re: The Free Super Chiefs
|
| (...) I think it's still debatable. Of course I mentioned that depending on the circumstances, I would take the effort to help the sender correct their mistake. While I don't call my self a Christian, it is certainly in my values to try and be fair. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|   rights, property (score: 0.888) |
|
 | | LEGO(R) Universe Won't Arrive This Year
|
| LEGO(R) Universe Won't Arrive This Year (2009) By Brian Crecente- Feb. 17, 2009 Online multiplayer game LEGO(R) Universe won't be coming out this year as planned, the LEGO Group told Kotaku this morning. "Within the company we have made a strategic (...) (17 years ago, 17-Feb-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.announce, FTX) !
| |
|   rights (score: 0.888) |
|
 | | Re: library license
|
| (...) That would (as I understand things) be impossible from a legal point of view. (...) Maybe. But that would then require that all the parts authors formally transferred their copyright to LDraw.org. This is possible, but parts authors living in (...) (22 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.887) |
|
| |
|   rights (score: 0.887) |
|
 | | Mac Brick CAD and the Imerial Star Destroyer
|
| Following the comments by James with Orion Pobursky's version of 10030 (Imperial Star Destroyer), I took a look at the file. In it's original form there was 3 problems: 1. MBC is case sensitive when referencing sub-models (don't know if this is good (...) (22 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.887) |
|
 | | Re: Stunning new Maersk set?
|
| (...) I am fully aware Velux sells them online, now. But before they ever did (this was many years ago), I was told by this Velux staffer here in Toronto that they received literally a hundred calls about these little houses, first asking for them (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.886) |
|
 | | Re: Lego in a government fraud article
|
| (...) And only because they didn't do anything work-related with them. If they would really have used them in teaching their engineers that would have been perfectly ok. The full report is at (URL) : "We identified four Lego Mindstorm computer robot (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|   all, property (score: 0.886) |
|
 | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
| (...) I have seen the writing on the wall for Bush ever since he dragged us into an unjustified war. His administration has repeatedly shown signs that they have completely mis-read the situation in Iraq from the beginning, and it was sadly doomed (...) (22 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.885) |
|
 | | Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
|
| (...) They're out there if you want them. I'm sure they've been discussed to death here before, but I don't have time right now to track that down. So once again it's google to the rescue. Here's a short list from one of the sites. Reasons for going (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|   all, rights (score: 0.885) |