LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 701 – 720 of about 136000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) Truthfully? I'm not sure you can, in much the same way that it's currently impossible to disprove the existence of ET life in the universe. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of using unprovable statements to disprove other unprovable (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.905)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) You know what, in my crazier moments I'd be happy to leave the definition of "marriage" to whatever non governmental sanctioning bodies wanted to sanction it, and they can define it however they like. As part of that leaving I'd then go (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) My objection is to the use of the terms "activist judge" or "judicial activism" as short-hand subsitutions for actual debate. Too often Conservative pundits have decried judicial rulings as "activist" without presenting any legitimate (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) No problem! Amendment IX - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X - Powers of the States (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) Can you prove that those ideals predate Judeism or the roots thereof? Show me some documented proof, not scientific theories. Even the great Stephen Hawking is recanting one of his most cherished theories today. (...) Just as the state's (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) Last time I checked Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. They're not allowed to pass laws to prevent religious zealots from flavoring the law with their religious (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: polygyny in "biblical times"
(...) Don't forget anullment which is the Catholics' way of getting around that little religious entanglement. (...) Now, see, there you're just restricting the rights of the citizenry to break their solemn vows. That'll never fly (heck, in (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Contributer Agreement Version 3
Here's a link to Version 2 and the follow on discussion: (URL) version 3 of the CA. Again, if you have criticism, please also offer a solution if warrented. Changes: - Got rid of the "No Response" option. This is now incorporated into the text of (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: Santorum Fails In His Effort To Pervert The Constitution
(...) Clearly. Article 3, section 2: "The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, etc." To abridge this function of the judiciary would indeed require an amendment. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.904)

		Re: Contributer Agreement v2
Here is my take on this second version of the license Peter (...) And you've changed the first EndUser license from Creative Commons Share Alike License [1] to Creative Commons Attribute License [2] I presume this was because of the ShareAlike (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

all, rights
(score: 0.903)

		Re: The funniest thing I've seen in months
(...) Well, um, I mean, uh... We're just talking hypothetically, right? None of us would ever dream of truly circumventing a protection of this sort? (...) Actually, I know people who know everything. I'm just the medium, like the pipe that carries (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.903)

		Re: AFOLs Parody, the text portion
DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING! I WAS CENSORED! I DEMAND FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND OTHER AMMENDMENT RIGHTS I DON'T REALLY HAVE AS A CANADIAN! THE LEGO-MAN IS KEEPING ME DOWN! IT'S A SEE-OH-EN-SPIRACY! SOME BIG THUG GUYS FROM DENMARK CAME TO MY HOUSE, TORE UP (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.color)

all, rights
(score: 0.903)

		Re: Moving the License Forward
(...) <snip> (...) Quoting Yoda, "Hard to see, the future is". The ability to change the ShareAlike license is to hedge our bets against unforseen issues. If you are omnipotent (should I call you Q?), then you can see all forseeable issues and can (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

all, rights
(score: 0.902)

		Re: Moving the License Forward
(...) positive (...) And I maintain, if there are not enough authors still active at a time this potential situation were to come up, It could be near impossible to make the change. If there were a situation where the change was needed, and there (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

all, rights
(score: 0.902)

		Re: Moving the License Forward
(...) I admit my turnout values may have been optimistic :) But I still feel that a greater than 50.00000something percent positive vote ought to be needed to move away from something as good as the ShareAlike license. (...) What, at the risk of (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

all, rights
(score: 0.902)

		Re: Moving the License Forward
(...) Skip the above. The C.A. can't take away any rights of the author, and shouldn't. Several people maintain webpages of 'their' parts, and they should be able to do so. If people want to distribute their own parts, more power to them (...) (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

all, rights
(score: 0.902)

		Re: Taking the bait (was Re: Fair use and allusion?)
(...) Why is that my task? I'm not asserting that your claim is false but rather that your assertions don't support it. (...) That, too, may be a matter of perspective. If your claim is that Moore is not factual, then you must document his (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, property
(score: 0.901)

		Re: We'll take in your poor, your homeless, your oppressed...
(...) "no intervention" - the UN has repeatedly placed economic sanctions on countries for human rights abuses. "slaughter" is a loaded term. A nation has a right to defend itself from insurgents and rebels. A nation has a right to enforce its own (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.901)

		Best Hacker
Do you need help to spy on someone or something? Are you worried about a cheating partner or spouse? Find out and catch a cheating partner with facts and evidence to back it up, do you need help recover lost or stolen passwords, track and monitor (...) (4 years ago, 15-Dec-21, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)

all
(score: 0.901)

		Lego gadget thing
Have you all seen this, someone forwarded it to me. ---...--- This message was forwarded to you as a service of Tipomatic To receive your very own copy of this tip in your email box each day, visit (URL) - (URL) Presents The Gadget of the Day Monday (...) (26 years ago, 12-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.901)

More: Next Page >>