LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 721 – 740 of about 136000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Parental strategies? (was: Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne)
(...) Yes, a parent's love should be unconditional for their children. Even so, I'm not sure one can really turn love on and off for their kids. (...) I tested my theory with my own kids last night. They actually gave me that answer. Maybe I have (...) (25 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.901)

		Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3A0DB4A3.2F33B6...ing.com... (...) that the (...) the (...) Right, I brought this up here last year, while debating Larry, who was much more steadfast and aware of his stance on the abortion (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.900)

		Re: From Harry Browne
(...) There are some interesting things to explore here. I agree that a "viability" test is certainly part of the rights based calculus which should be used to evaluate these things. One way to examine the issue is that the unborn baby only has the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.900)

		Re: Parental strategies? (was: Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne)
(...) they (...) me, so (...) Well, how about it? I know that that takes place. But what is behind that? What do they know will happen when they are "displeased with me?" And I think it is distinctly unhealthy for kids to grow up in an environment (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.900)

		How to operate the Crocodile without smartphone...
Hi all, maybe this is limited to the German community, but many LEGO fans there dislike the idea of using the smartphone to control LEGO models. Especially when it comes to trains (and kids being involved in playing with them), many do prefer a (...) (4 years ago, 23-Nov-21, to lugnet.trains)

all
(score: 0.899)

		Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
(...) I'd agree... Assuming of course that the person is of sound mind, and that the rights of others are not being violated in doing so. Clear cut example, I don't have the right to fill up a truck with explosives and then drive to your house and (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.899)

		Re: From Harry Browne
Hi Maggie, This is debate, so that's what we'll do. "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message... (...) I'm (...) clarification. I disagree. I don't believe anyone's viewpoint will be swayed if we all keep our opinions to ourselves. I (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.899)

		Re: Oh no - Crocodile disappeared in S@H / discontinued as trains are not selling?
I didn't realize the new Crocodile won't operate at all without a smart phone. That is sad to hear. I haven't yet seen on on the track - it looks like it is much more of a display model than an operating model. Is it almost "too realistic" for Lego? (...) (4 years ago, 28-Nov-21, to lugnet.trains)

all
(score: 0.899)

		Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
(...) Your term may indeed be accurate, but I think that it does not do full justice to the inherent and latent qualities of the tissue structure. When confronting the abortion issue from either angle, the issue of potential cannot be avoided. My (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights, property
(score: 0.899)

		Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
(...) But it does demonstrate irrefutably that those rights are not inalienable, contrary to the assertion of the founding fathers. Inalienable rights that can be taken away aren't very inalienable. And in all practical ways, rights that are utterly (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.899)

		Re: UN Gets it Right!
(...) I trust you do not mean that war crimes are constitutional? ;) (...) I'm sure many others would say Bush heading it would also be a "farce". After all, it is Bush's record on human rights which stopped him getting the ICC exemption extended. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.898)

		Re: Gay Marriage
I have to admit, being a Massachusetts-ite, this subject line piqued my interest. Pardon while I crash the party... (...) Doesn't it though? I think Larry quoted the rights quite accurately. But you can get more specific than that if you're (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.898)

		Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
I've written here before that I think it would be more valuable to reframe the entire notion of rights as responsibilities. I think the absolutism of rights is easy to get tripped up on. (At least for me.) (...) One common stance is that an entity (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.898)

		Re: Taking the bait (was Re: Fair use and allusion?)
(...) OK, The support needed is rather different, though. You need to support with logic that my characterisations of Moore somehow falsify what I said.\ I need to support by showing that Moore isn't factual, and that his assertions don't follow (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.897)

		Re: Taking the bait (was Re: Fair use and allusion?)
(...) Because the willful choice not to support your argument is indistinguishable from forfeiting the argument, I accept this as your forfeiture. If it is not your intent to forfeit, then I invite you to support your argument, as you have demanded (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.897)

		Lego Space Set Reviews!!!!
Yeah, I wanted a project during Covid and this was as good as it gets for me... And no one else posts here anymore - not even that guy talking about monthly dinners... So with much further ado, I've been building and reviewing all LEGO space sets, (...) (4 years ago, 4-Nov-21, to lugnet.space)

all
(score: 0.897)

		Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
(...) The problem here is the conflation of legal notion with absolute reality. Rights are the legal/political expression of an aesthetic that nearly everyone (involved in the discussion) supports. While I wrote before that I was siding with John, (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

		Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
(...) This is a very nice summation, overall. (...) A good distinction to bear in mind. I don't think I have the ammunition to prove my case scientifically, so I should probably say I'm aiming for the philosophical angle. To clarify: By "inherent (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

		Re: Fair use and allusion?
(...) No I'm not. Reread what you cited. "tends to suggest" is hardly Summarily Dismissed. Further, being wrong about an issue or cause is not the same as dismissing the issue or cause. I dismiss his opinions about issues (for valid cause since he's (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

		Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:HzICys.15Iv@lugnet.com... (...) as if (...) The (...) same (...) I've definitely had some trouble with the origin of rights. They feel inherent, yet it also seems generally accepted (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

More: Next Page >>