To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 741 – 760 of about 136000.
Search took 0.03 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Gay Marriage
 
(...) I'm not sure why you're missing my point. I'm OK with any sort of union between any number of people (or, if in future other species are uplifted or discovered such that they can give informed consent) or other species as long as everyone (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

  Gay Marriage
 
(...) I'll cite the Bill of Rights to the US Constitution. You even know the amendment... it's the one that discusses the right of citizens to associate (or not) as they choose. Then I'll cite contract law in general. People can enter into (or not (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

  Re: Gay Marriage
 
(...) Don't you? I mean, the way US laws are written, I believe there are rights provided to married couples that wouldn't be to anyone under something like 'civil unions'. Speaking of which, is that what you're advocating? If so, how would a 'civil (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) All I am asking is upon what do you believe our society is based. If you think it is a myriad of things, fine. What are they? (...) Upon what exactly do you base your assertion? (...) What I mean is that you are asserting things for which you (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) Sure, IRL, but I was speaking theoretically, as I believe were the FF. Merely because someone is able to oppress me and take away my rights doesn't justify it. (...) That is precisely why I claim they are divinely-endowed, so that no one has (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.896)

  Review: 10152 Maersk Ship
 
---...--- LEGO Set Review Form V2.4 created by Joshua Delahunty (Internet: dulcaoin@alumni.cse.ucsc.edu) 10152 Promotional / Maersk Maersk Sealand Ages 8+, 988 Pcs. (C)2004. 55 page manual: 1 models, 53 steps. Price Range: $74.99 USD RATINGS (Scale: (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-04, to lugnet.reviews)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.895)

  Re: New Product Announcement - 10152
 
(...) And all this doesn't take into account other taxes Americans pay yearly. * personal property tax * vehicle tax * sin tax (cigs, alcohol, and other "non-necessary things) * gasoline tax (30-40 cents per gallon?) * Medicaire (not a tax) * Social (...) (22 years ago, 27-May-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.general)
 

all, property
(score: 0.895)

  Re: License Intent
 
All what follows is my opinion only. (...) authors "give up copyright". Let's not confuse PD with right of redistribution. Let's not confuse giving up copyright with right of redistribution. What I am suggesting is that by posting a part to the (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.895)

  Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
 
(...) So you think that the oil wealth is distributed equally per capita? That's remarkably Socialist of you, John, but it's not the reality. The state (states, really, seven of 'em) where wealth distribution on public projects is greatest is the (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)  
 

all, property
(score: 0.895)

  Re: From Richard: "It's all bad news - Chaos is my fault"
 
(...) I see in this post this suggestion advanced again. I think I have seen it before. It goes well with this one that John prepared earlier: (...) I mentioned that I saw a structure and underlying logic in some of Scott's posts, and felt bad for (...) (22 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, property
(score: 0.894)

  Re: LEGO Group and Disney Announce Strategic Licensing Relationship for 2010
 
(...) They also used it to produce Winnie the Pooh sets before they found out that Disney didn't actually have any legal grounds to license the property to them. But they'd probably prefer to not dwell on that... (17 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, lugnet.disney)
 

property
(score: 0.894)

  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) Thank you for that clarification. I meant that I choose lines that I believe are absolutely drawn out. My point was that I am not the only one who adheres to drawn lines. We all do. (...) Eh, when the perspective is from the Creator of the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.894)

  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) No one thing!!! People often pull this "sky is falling" gimick about some trivial little detail claiming that a change will cause the collapse of society. If we granted universal marriage rights to homosexuals -- as we would if we were a (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.893)

  Re: License Intent
 
(...) You are correct here, I should have used the term 'file' or 'work' instead of 'part'. From a copyright standpoint I mean 'work of an author'. (...) There are two ways to looks at this issue. 1) Get permission of all those involved and get them (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.893)

  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) But you're wrote "You draw your lines, I draw mine." That is an explicit statement of self-imposed limitations. Is that your intent? Or do you really mean "You draw your lines, I adhere to absolute lines drawn out for me by millennia-old (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.893)

  Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
 
(...) I realize this and I believe in an absolute morality, but he doesn't. I am trying to appeal to his sensibilities, not mine (which I know he flatly rejects). I am arguing on his turf, as it were. (...) I assume you are talking about when I (...) (22 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.893)

  The Torturers Among Us
 
Count on a professional newspaper columnist to articulate so clearly what I have been saying for the past three years. The Bush Administration has abused the 9/11 tragedy as an excuse to engage in a deplorable deterioration of human rights. The (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.893)

  Re: License Intent
 
(...) Is a non commercial clause part of the SteerCo's intent? It wasn't mentioned in the initial post or in Larry's update. Could you clarify for me? Discounting the use of rendered parts in commercial products, eg. Larry selling ldraw rendered (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.892)

  Re: License Intent
 
(...) I am not sure I mind allowing SteerCo/LDraw.org to relicense my parts under a different license, but I definitely don't want to give SteerCo/LDraw.org any special rights. That would also be a violation of point 5 in The Open Source Definition (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.892)

  Re: License Intent
 
(...) Well first of all there are different things being granted. An author grants rights to a particular part (each time he or she uploads that part), not the entire library. The user gets rights granted to the entire library as a whole. However, (...) (22 years ago, 26-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

all, rights
(score: 0.891)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR