|
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops
|
| (...) Now that's just ridiculous. While I would understand your concern if his TOS violation was in regards to non-payment or non-shipping, let's face it, it wasn't. It was about a particular policy which hadn't been clearly enough spelled out until (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 0.952)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.951)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) You admit to being angry / bitter and use terms such as theft... it is difficult to take your argument seriously as it sounds so subjective. (...) I did before... that is why I said "This is all very circular." (...) It is not an important (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.951)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) it (...) Um, well, I think most people get angry sometimes. That doesn't mean that they can't be objective. And is it your contention that the use of the term 'theft' is a clear indicator of subjectivity? I have yet to hear you or any other (...) (24 years ago, 11-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.951)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.951)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| | Re: .rtlToronto Stats
|
| (...) People from St. Kitts are quite adamant about people spelling their city name properly--I even recall a fleet of trucks that had "St. Catharines--Give this city an 'A'!" plastered on the back doors. (...) Hamilton = Steeltown Winona = (...) (20 years ago, 3-Aug-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) Marx said so. (...) It could be argued I exploietd the system could it not - that is your normal perspective. (...) Education is exploitation – what a novel way to reduce your tax bill. (...) Why not prosecute all involved? (...) I must be a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| Now I know exactly what Larry means when saying that all you do is snipe. In your earlier posts, you lured me in by saying enough to trick me into believing that you were interested in talking about it. Now, the best I get is one liners. (...) And (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) That's sorta irrelevant-- As I stated elsewhere, yes, I'm all for allowing polygamy, etc (provided some probably some other changes), and all for letting consenting aliens get married if we find any, but that's not the point. The proposed (...) (20 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.950)
|
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Larry, hello everybody, (...) I do understand by now what was going on in the last few weeks, and why. However, there hasn't been much response to my second point, which was about Brickshelf L.L.C. claiming all rights with uploaded scans: (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.949)
|
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) That is required to prevent claims from those who submit material to us. It is standard business practice (think of contests where people submit entries). To be clear, yes it does mean that you give up any and all rights to scans you submit to (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.949)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) But what do you think? (...) Oh, I think it's a two way street. That's why there's nothing wrong with it. When you're an employee, you're being exploited because someone is (traditionally) making money from your labor. But you're exploiting (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.949)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Company Welcomes Adult LEGO Enthusiasts
|
| (...) That is to be expected, and that wasn't the point I was trying to make. I'm not offended by people copying my designs for their own private enjoyment. Suppose LEGO claims rights to any sets you create using their service. Suppose they go on to (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.949)
|
|
| | Re: Authorized Lego retailers
|
| (...) The following text comes directly from an actual Lego Systems, Inc. order invoice/packing slip from March 2003 on a form dated January 1993. Only relevant portions reproduced here exactly as presented on the form; emphasis is exactly as on the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.market.theory)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.948)
|
|
| | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) Quick answer, for closure. Under a property rights analysis, there is no right to sustenance, per se. There is a right to offer to trade for or pay for or ask for charitiable sustenance but no requirement that anyone in particular actually (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 0.948)
|
|
| | Re: Preaching to the Choir
|
| (...) One issue at a time, John! If would-be polyandrists wish to marry in groups, let them plead their case. At present the issue pertains to two-party contracts. In any case, I have yet to hear a convincing argument as to why multi-party marriages (...) (20 years ago, 11-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.948)
|
